GLB CAPITAL SDN BHD (NO. SYARIKAT : 1296760-A) SOFIA NABILLA BINTI MOHD SALLEH (NO. K/p : 980824-03-5916)
The High Court refused the plaintiff’s strike-out application (Lampiran 14) because discretion to allow late affidavit was properly exercised in light of COVID quarantine; the originating summons (Lampiran 1) was dismissed because the plaintiff failed to prove indebtedness and entitlement to summary relief—there were material disputes of fact (payments by cheques, inadequate account statements) that require a full trial; costs awarded to defendant and plaintiff respectively.
- Citation
- WA-24FC-1021-09/2020 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Parties
- Plaintiff / Chargee: GLB Capital Sdn. Bhd.; Defendant / Mortgagor: Sofia Nabilla Binti Mohd Salleh
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 27 August 2021
- Case Number
- WA-24FC-1021-09/2020 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Originating Summons / High Court Judgment (decision on Originating Summons and Application)
- Outcome
- Plaintiff's application to strike out defendant's affidavit dismissed; Plaintiff's originating summons dismissed
- Legal Topics
- National Land Code S256 and S257, Originating Summons Procedure (order 83), Affidavit Striking/rule Compliance (order 28), Extension of Time / Court Discretion (order 3 R5 and Order 92 R4), Notice of Default and Sale by Chargee, Evidential Sufficiency of Account Statements
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
GLB Capital Sdn. Bhd.
Plaintiff / Chargee
Sofia Nabilla Binti Mohd Salleh
Defendant / Mortgagor
Procedural Posture
Civil Originating Summons / High Court Judgment (decision on Originating Summons and Application)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether plaintiff established indebtedness and entitlement to order for sale/possession on originating summons
- 2 Whether defendant's affidavit should be struck out for late filing/non-compliance
- 3 Whether factual disputes (payments by cheques to third parties) preclude summary relief
Ratio Decidendi
The High Court refused the plaintiff’s strike-out application (Lampiran 14) because discretion to allow late affidavit was properly exercised in light of COVID quarantine; the originating summons (Lampiran 1) was dismissed because the plaintiff failed to prove indebtedness and entitlement to summary relief—there were material disputes of fact (payments by cheques, inadequate account statements) that require a full trial; costs awarded to defendant and plaintiff respectively.
Court Disposition
Plaintiff's application to strike out defendant's affidavit dismissed; Plaintiff's originating summons dismissed
Orders
- Lampiran 14 (strike-out application) dismissed with costs RM2,000.00 to defendant
- Lampiran 1 (originating summons) dismissed with costs RM5,000.00 to defendant, costs subject to taxation
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment