1.LIM KANG SENG 2.LIM QWEE DING 1. RANI A/P MARIMUTHU merupakan ibu yang sah kepada PAUL RUBEN A/L PANBALAN, simati dan membawa tindakan ini untuk dirinya dan juga pihak estate simati di bawah Seksyen 7 & 8 Akta Undang-Undang Sivil 1956 2.
The appeal was dismissed because the High Court found no appealable error: the CCTV and investigating officer evidence supported the Sessions Court finding of 100% liability against the Defendants; the trial judge properly exercised discretion under s73A to admit employment and salary documents; and the awards for loss of dependency, general and special damages were reasonable and not so extreme as to warrant appellate interference under established standards.
- Citation
- JA-12B-53-11/2019 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Parties
- Appellant/defendant: LIM KANG SENG; Appellant/defendant: LIM QWEE DING; Respondent/plaintiff (representing Estate): RANI A/P MARIMUTHU; Respondent/plaintiff: DANIAL RUBEN A/L PANBALAN
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 10 November 2020
- Case Number
- JA-12B-53-11/2019 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal (motor Vehicle Personal Injury) / Final Judgment on Appeal (dismissed)
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; Sessions Court judgment affirmed
- Legal Topics
- Negligence, Apportionment of Liability, Loss of Dependency, Admissibility of Documentary Evidence (s73 A), Quantum of Damages, Standard of Appellate Review
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
LIM KANG SENG
Appellant/defendant
LIM QWEE DING
Appellant/defendant
RANI A/P MARIMUTHU
Respondent/plaintiff (representing Estate)
DANIAL RUBEN A/L PANBALAN
Respondent/plaintiff
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal (motor Vehicle Personal Injury) / Final Judgment on Appeal (dismissed)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the First Defendant was wholly liable for the collision
- 2 Whether contributory negligence/speeding by the deceased warranted apportionment of liability
- 3 Admissibility of employer salary documents under s73A of the Evidence Act 1950 without maker as witness
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal was dismissed because the High Court found no appealable error: the CCTV and investigating officer evidence supported the Sessions Court finding of 100% liability against the Defendants; the trial judge properly exercised discretion under s73A to admit employment and salary documents; and the awards for loss of dependency, general and special damages were reasonable and not so extreme as to warrant appellate interference under established standards.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; Sessions Court judgment affirmed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed
- Original judgment of the Sessions Court affirmed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment