1. SOH KIM CHEE sebagai bapa yang sah dan penanggungan kepada SOH YONG HAU simati, untuk diri sendiri 2. CHOON LIANG ENG sebagai ibu yang sah dan penanggungan kepada SOH YONG HAU simati, untuk diri sendiri 1. NAZRI BIN YAHYA 2. VITAL SUN SD
The appeal failed because the appellants did not discharge the legal burden to show on balance of probabilities that the Sessions Court's 50:50 apportionment and quantum assessment were wrong; the trial judge properly weighed SP4's neutral investigation, first defendant's corroborated account and physical evidence, applied Section 7 of the Civil Law Act correctly (including lawful deductions and exclusion of speculative bonus), and made no appealable error warranting reversal.
- Citation
- JA-12B-102-12/2020 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Parties
- Appellant / Plaintiff (father and Legal Guardian of Deceased): SOH KIM CHEE; Appellant / Plaintiff (mother and Legal Guardian of Deceased): CHOON LIANG ENG; Respondent / Defendant (first Defendant): NAZRI BIN YAHYA; Respondent / Defendant (second Defendant): VITAL SUN SDN BHD
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 6 September 2021
- Case Number
- JA-12B-102-12/2020 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal (motor Vehicle Wrongful Death) From Sessions Court / Judgment on Appeal (final Disposition)
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed with costs; Sessions Court judgment upheld
- Legal Topics
- Negligence, Apportionment of Liability, Loss of Support, Burden of Proof, Admissibility and Weight of Police Reports, Assessment of Damages and Interest
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
SOH KIM CHEE
Appellant / Plaintiff (father and Legal Guardian of Deceased)
CHOON LIANG ENG
Appellant / Plaintiff (mother and Legal Guardian of Deceased)
NAZRI BIN YAHYA
Respondent / Defendant (first Defendant)
VITAL SUN SDN BHD
Respondent / Defendant (second Defendant)
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal (motor Vehicle Wrongful Death) From Sessions Court / Judgment on Appeal (final Disposition)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Sessions Court erred in apportioning liability 50:50 rather than making defendants 100% liable
- 2 Whether the Sessions Court erred in assessment of quantum for loss of support including deductions and exclusion of bonus
- 3 Whether appellate intervention was justified given trial judge's advantages and applicable standards of review
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal failed because the appellants did not discharge the legal burden to show on balance of probabilities that the Sessions Court's 50:50 apportionment and quantum assessment were wrong; the trial judge properly weighed SP4's neutral investigation, first defendant's corroborated account and physical evidence, applied Section 7 of the Civil Law Act correctly (including lawful deductions and exclusion of speculative bonus), and made no appealable error warranting reversal.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed with costs; Sessions Court judgment upheld
Orders
- Appeal dismissed with costs
- Judgment of the Sessions Court affirmed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment