1. ) Mohd Riduan Bin Zainon 2. ) LARGUS ENGINEERING SDN BHD 1. ) XXXX 2. ) Mohamad Azamuddin Bin Azhar
The trial judge's finding of 100% liability was set aside; on balance of probabilities the respondents' version was more probable but the juvenile age and lack of competence of Responden 1 warranted contributory negligence apportioned 30% to respondents and 70% to appellants; several quantum awards were adjusted (notably general damages for Responden 1 head injury increased to RM300,000 then reduced 20% for helmet non‑use resulting in RM240,000; nursing care awarded at RM1,300 per month for 40 years totalling RM624,000; diapers award reduced to RM12,000) and other specific awards were either upheld or varied as set out in the order.
- Citation
- DA-12B-47-10/2022 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Parties
- Appellant (perayu 1): Mohd Riduan bin Zainon; Appellant (perayu 2): Largus Engineering Sdn Bhd; Respondent (responden 1): Muhammad Hafizuddin bin Azhar; Respondent (responden 2): Mohamad Azamuddin bin Azhar
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 21 September 2023
- Case Number
- DA-12B-47-10/2022 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal From Sessions Court / Appellate Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed in part; cross‑appeal allowed in part; trial court's 100% liability finding set aside and liability apportioned 70% to appellants and 30% to respondents; various quantum awards modified as below; parties to bear their own costs; interest 2.5% p.a. from date of writ to date of judgment and 5% p.a. from...
- Legal Topics
- Negligence, Contributory Negligence, Apportionment of Liability, Assessment of Damages, Interest on Judgment
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mohd Riduan bin Zainon
Appellant (perayu 1)
Largus Engineering Sdn Bhd
Appellant (perayu 2)
Muhammad Hafizuddin bin Azhar
Respondent (responden 1)
Mohamad Azamuddin bin Azhar
Respondent (responden 2)
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal From Sessions Court / Appellate Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the trial judge erred in finding appellants 100% liable
- 2 Proper apportionment of contributory negligence between parties
- 3 Whether awards for general and special damages were manifestly excessive or inadequate
Ratio Decidendi
The trial judge's finding of 100% liability was set aside; on balance of probabilities the respondents' version was more probable but the juvenile age and lack of competence of Responden 1 warranted contributory negligence apportioned 30% to respondents and 70% to appellants; several quantum awards were adjusted (notably general damages for Responden 1 head injury increased to RM300,000 then reduced 20% for helmet non‑use resulting in RM240,000; nursing care awarded at RM1,300 per month for 40 years totalling RM624,000; diapers award reduced to RM12,000) and other specific awards were either upheld or varied as set out in the order.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed in part; cross‑appeal allowed in part; trial court's 100% liability finding set aside and liability apportioned 70% to appellants and 30% to respondents; various quantum awards modified as below; parties to bear their own costs; interest 2.5% p.a. from date of writ to date of judgment and 5% p.a. from...
Orders
- Set aside finding of 100% liability by Sessions Court and substitute apportionment: 70% appellants, 30% respondents
- General damages for Responden 1 (traumatic severe head injury) awarded RM300,000 less 20% for helmet non‑use = RM240,000
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment