1. ) PENGARAH/JURUTERA DAERAH JABATAN KERJA RAYA NEGERI SEMBILAN 2. ) Jabatan Kerja Raya Seremban 3. ) Kerajaan Malaysia 1. ) IQMAL IZZUDDEEN BIN MOHD ROSTHY 2. ) YANG DIPERTUA MAJLIS PERBANDARAN SEREMBAN 3. ) MAJLIS PERBANDARAN SEREMBAN 4.
The Court allowed the appeal of Defendants 3-5 on liability, holding that supervision and maintenance of the roadside tree was the responsibility of the local authority (Defendants 1 and 2) under section 101(b) Local Government Act 1976; Defendants 6 and 7 were not liable because their maintenance concession had expired; the trial court's factual finding that the tree was rotten and top-heavy causing the fall was upheld and applied to attribute liability to the local council rather than JKR or the former concessionaire.
- Citation
- N-04(W)-496-11/2023 (Mahkamah Rayuan)
- Parties
- Plaintiff / Respondent: Iqmal Izzuddeen bin Mohd Rosthy; Defendant 1 / Appellant: Yang Dipertua Majlis Perbandaran Seremban; Defendant 2 / Appellant: Majlis Perbandaran Seremban; Defendant 3 / Appellant: Pengarah/Jurutera Daerah Jabatan Kerja Raya Seremban; Defendant 4 / Appellant: Jabatan Kerja Raya Seremban; Defendant 5 / Appellant: Kerajaan Malaysia; Defendant 6 / Respondent: Pengurus Kawasan Selia Selenggara Selatan Sdn Bhd; Defendant 7 / Respondent: Selia Selenggara Selatan Sdn Bhd
- Court
- W
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 19 March 2025
- Case Number
- N-04(W)-496-11/2023 (Mahkamah Rayuan)
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal (tort Negligence) / Court of Appeal Judgment on Liability and Quantum
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed in part.
- Legal Topics
- Negligence, Duty of Care, Statutory Duty, Causation, Remoteness, Maintenance of Public Roads and Trees
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Iqmal Izzuddeen bin Mohd Rosthy
Plaintiff / Respondent
Yang Dipertua Majlis Perbandaran Seremban
Defendant 1 / Appellant
Majlis Perbandaran Seremban
Defendant 2 / Appellant
Pengarah/Jurutera Daerah Jabatan Kerja Raya Seremban
Defendant 3 / Appellant
Jabatan Kerja Raya Seremban
Defendant 4 / Appellant
Kerajaan Malaysia
Defendant 5 / Appellant
Pengurus Kawasan Selia Selenggara Selatan Sdn Bhd
Defendant 6 / Respondent
Selia Selenggara Selatan Sdn Bhd
Defendant 7 / Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal (tort Negligence) / Court of Appeal Judgment on Liability and Quantum
Legal Issues
- 1 Who is legally responsible for supervision/maintenance of the roadside tree that caused injury?
- 2 Whether the plaintiff proved negligence and breach of statutory duties by the defendants.
- 3 Whether concessionaires (Def 6 and 7) were liable given expiration of their concession.
Ratio Decidendi
The Court allowed the appeal of Defendants 3-5 on liability, holding that supervision and maintenance of the roadside tree was the responsibility of the local authority (Defendants 1 and 2) under section 101(b) Local Government Act 1976; Defendants 6 and 7 were not liable because their maintenance concession had expired; the trial court's factual finding that the tree was rotten and top-heavy causing the fall was upheld and applied to attribute liability to the local council rather than JKR or the former concessionaire.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed in part.
Orders
- Appeal of Defendants 3-5 against liability allowed with costs.
- The High Court appellate finding that Defendants 3-5 were liable is set aside.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment