KALIAMMA A/P SINNASAMY [NRIC No.: 790308-01-5428] AIA BERHAD [COMPANY No: 790895-D]
The trial judge’s factual findings that the deceased was diagnosed with iron deficiency anaemia, had knowledge of the condition during the 2012 hospitalisation and willfully failed to disclose the hospitalisation and medical condition on the insurance application were supported by medical records and witness evidence and were not plainly wrong; therefore the insurer was entitled to repudiate both policies and the appeal was dismissed.
- Citation
- JA-12BNCVC-07-08/2020 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Parties
- Appellant/plaintiff: Kaliamma a/p Sinnasamy; Respondent/defendant: AIA Berhad
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 20 October 2021
- Case Number
- JA-12BNCVC-07-08/2020 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal From Sessions Court (insurance Claim) / Appeal After Full Trial and Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Non Disclosure of Material Facts, Misrepresentation, Policy Repudiation, Burden of Proof, Pleading Requirements
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Kaliamma a/p Sinnasamy
Appellant/plaintiff
AIA Berhad
Respondent/defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal From Sessions Court (insurance Claim) / Appeal After Full Trial and Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the deceased was diagnosed with a blood disorder (iron deficiency anaemia) and hospitalised in 2012
- 2 Whether the deceased had knowledge of that diagnosis prior to signing the insurance applications
- 3 Whether the deceased’s failure to disclose amounted to misrepresentation/non-disclosure permitting the insurer to repudiate the policies
Ratio Decidendi
The trial judge’s factual findings that the deceased was diagnosed with iron deficiency anaemia, had knowledge of the condition during the 2012 hospitalisation and willfully failed to disclose the hospitalisation and medical condition on the insurance application were supported by medical records and witness evidence and were not plainly wrong; therefore the insurer was entitled to repudiate both policies and the appeal was dismissed.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed
- Costs awarded to respondent in the sum of RM3,000.00 subject to allocatur fees
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment