1. ABDUL GHAPOR HUSSIN 2. ABDUL LATIF ABU SAMAH 3. ABDUL RASHEED B. ABD KADER 4. ABDULLAH HJ. KHUSRANI 5. AMRAN ARIFFIN 6. ASLINA BT APLI 7. CHAN KOK TIANG 8. CHANDRA SHARIAN 9. CHEN YEW CHIEW 10. CHO SUET SEN 11. CHONG CHIEW YING 12. CHOW
The court held that the applicants were entitled to general damages for loss of amenity caused by the unlawful development; evidence from a single representative applicant was admissible where the damage was common and calling all applicants would be repetitive and unnecessary; the applicants' valuer's compensation report was unreliable because it included impacts of other lawful blocks and advanced non-expert opinions, but nuisance and loss of amenity were established and justified an award of general damages of RM20,000 per applicant with interest and costs.
- Citation
- MT4-13-24-2003 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Parties
- Applicants: Abdul Ghapor Hussin & Ors; 1st Respondent: Majlis Perbandaran Petaling Jaya; 2nd Respondent: Mentari Housing Development Sdn Bhd; Intervener: Mani Malah A/P Muniandy & Ors; Intervener: Kerajaan Negeri Selangor
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 3 September 2020
- Case Number
- MT4-13-24-2003 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review (planning Permission) With Assessment of Damages / Assessment of Damages Following Successful Judicial Review and Final Exhaustion of Appeals (high Court Assessment)
- Outcome
- Applicants' application for assessment of damages allowed in part; award of general damages for loss of amenity granted to each applicant.
- Legal Topics
- Nuisance, Loss of Amenity, Damages Assessment, Judicial Review, Planning Permission
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Abdul Ghapor Hussin & Ors
Applicants
Majlis Perbandaran Petaling Jaya
1st Respondent
Mentari Housing Development Sdn Bhd
2nd Respondent
Mani Malah A/P Muniandy & Ors
Intervener
Kerajaan Negeri Selangor
Intervener
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review (planning Permission) With Assessment of Damages / Assessment of Damages Following Successful Judicial Review and Final Exhaustion of Appeals (high Court Assessment)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the court could rely on the evidence of a single representative applicant instead of calling all applicants
- 2 Whether the representative witness had authority or consent to testify on behalf of the other applicants
- 3 Whether the compensation/valuation report prepared by the applicants' valuer was admissible and reliable for assessing diminution and loss of amenity
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that the applicants were entitled to general damages for loss of amenity caused by the unlawful development; evidence from a single representative applicant was admissible where the damage was common and calling all applicants would be repetitive and unnecessary; the applicants' valuer's compensation report was unreliable because it included impacts of other lawful blocks and advanced non-expert opinions, but nuisance and loss of amenity were established and justified an award of general damages of RM20,000 per applicant with interest and costs.
Court Disposition
Applicants' application for assessment of damages allowed in part; award of general damages for loss of amenity granted to each applicant.
Orders
- Each applicant awarded general damages of RM20,000.00
- Pre-judgment interest of 8% per annum from date of cause of action (15.3.2003) until 3.9.2020 pursuant to section 11 Civil Law Act 1956
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment