Ong Siang Pheng 1. Millennium Mall Sdn Bhd 2. Millennium Land Sdn Bhd 3. Millennium Acres Sdn Bhd
The application was dismissed because the proposed questions were not suitable for final disposal under O.14A nor for a preliminary trial under O.33 r.2: the material facts were disputed or interwoven with legal issues (notably extensive lease rental claims and corporate veil issues), the determination would not substantially dispose of the action or save time and costs, and a preliminary determination would likely cause delay and prejudice (including appeals and stays).
- Citation
- BA-22NCVC-94-03/2020 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Parties
- Plaintiff (representative): Ong Siang Pheng; 1st Defendant: Millennium Mall Sdn. Bhd.; 2nd Defendant: Millennium Land Sdn. Bhd.; 3rd Defendant: Millennium Acres Sdn. Bhd.
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 5 May 2021
- Case Number
- BA-22NCVC-94-03/2020 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Representative Action (property/contract) / Interlocutory Application Under O.14 a And/or O.33 R.2 Dismissed (pre Trial/case Management)
- Outcome
- 1st Defendant's application under O.14A and/or O.33 r.2 dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Order 14 a Disposal on Question of Law, Order 33 Preliminary Question Trial, Void Ab Initio of Agreements, Property Management Agreement Validity, Strata Management Act Compliance, Refund/quantum of Entitlement, Lifting of Corporate Veil
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ong Siang Pheng
Plaintiff (representative)
Millennium Mall Sdn. Bhd.
1st Defendant
Millennium Land Sdn. Bhd.
2nd Defendant
Millennium Acres Sdn. Bhd.
3rd Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Representative Action (property/contract) / Interlocutory Application Under O.14 a And/or O.33 R.2 Dismissed (pre Trial/case Management)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Property Management Agreement (PMA) is void ab initio and unenforceable under Contract Act 1950, Strata Titles Act 1985 and Strata Management Act 2013
- 2 Whether, if PMA is void ab initio, the 1st Defendant is entitled to refund of RM7,153,696.17
- 3 Whether the proposed questions are suitable for determination under O.14A without full trial
Ratio Decidendi
The application was dismissed because the proposed questions were not suitable for final disposal under O.14A nor for a preliminary trial under O.33 r.2: the material facts were disputed or interwoven with legal issues (notably extensive lease rental claims and corporate veil issues), the determination would not substantially dispose of the action or save time and costs, and a preliminary determination would likely cause delay and prejudice (including appeals and stays).
Court Disposition
1st Defendant's application under O.14A and/or O.33 r.2 dismissed
Orders
- Enclosure 119 dismissed
- Costs of the application assessed at RM5000.00 subject to allocator
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment