Lee Choon Seng & Sons Sdn Bhd Tewara Sdn Bhd PIHAK YANG DIGARNIS PUBLIC BANK BERHAD
The court held that it has jurisdiction to entertain the application but JD's affidavit in reply was filed out of time and not supported by acceptable evidence, JD failed to particularize alleged calculation errors and non‑disclosure of pending appeals was not sufficiently material to have prevented the ex‑parte order; service timing did not vitiate the garnishee order because the garnishee was first served in accordance with the court's directions and the hearing was postponed; accordingly the application to set aside the garnishee order was dismissed but an interim suspension was granted delaying the making absolute of the garnishee order pending resolution of JD's stay application at...
- Citation
- JA-37G-23-06/2023 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Parties
- Judgment Creditor: LEE CHOON SENG & SONS SDN BHD; Judgment Debtor: TEWARA SDN BHD; Garnishee: PUBLIC BANK BERHAD
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 20 November 2023
- Case Number
- JA-37G-23-06/2023 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Procedural Posture
- Interlocutory Application to Set Aside Garnishee Order / Decision on Application; Interim Suspension Ordered
- Outcome
- Application to set aside garnishee order dismissed; interim suspension of making garnishee order absolute granted pending disposition of stay application at High Court
- Legal Topics
- Order 49 Garnishee Proceedings, Setting Aside Ex‑parte Garnishee Order, Non‑disclosure in Ex‑parte Applications, Extension of Time for Affidavits, Interim Stay Pending Appeal
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
LEE CHOON SENG & SONS SDN BHD
Judgment Creditor
TEWARA SDN BHD
Judgment Debtor
PUBLIC BANK BERHAD
Garnishee
Procedural Posture
Interlocutory Application to Set Aside Garnishee Order / Decision on Application; Interim Suspension Ordered
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the High Court has jurisdiction to set aside an ex‑parte garnishee order
- 2 Whether the judgment debtor's affidavit in reply was filed out of time and should be excluded
- 3 Whether the calculation relied upon by the judgment creditor was incorrect
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that it has jurisdiction to entertain the application but JD's affidavit in reply was filed out of time and not supported by acceptable evidence, JD failed to particularize alleged calculation errors and non‑disclosure of pending appeals was not sufficiently material to have prevented the ex‑parte order; service timing did not vitiate the garnishee order because the garnishee was first served in accordance with the court's directions and the hearing was postponed; accordingly the application to set aside the garnishee order was dismissed but an interim suspension was granted delaying the making absolute of the garnishee order pending resolution of JD's stay application at...
Court Disposition
Application to set aside garnishee order dismissed; interim suspension of making garnishee order absolute granted pending disposition of stay application at High Court
Orders
- Application by TEWARA SDN BHD to set aside garnishee order dated 18.7.2023 dismissed
- Affidavit in reply filed by TEWARA SDN BHD on 8.10.2023 excluded from consideration
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment