PENDAKWARAYA Muhammad Shafwan bin Aided (No. K/P: 920909-10-6037)
Prosecution proved possession and knowledge of the seized drugs; laboratory analysis established 75.23g methamphetamine triggering the rebuttable statutory presumption of trafficking under s37(da)(xvi) which the accused failed to rebut on the balance of probabilities; therefore a prima facie case for trafficking methamphetamine was established and the accused was convicted under s39B(1)(a) (resulting in mandatory sentence under s39B(2)); the heroin/monoacetylmorphines charge lacked evidence of distribution and was amended to possession under s12(2)/s39A(2) and convicted accordingly.
- Citation
- PA-45A-31-04/2018 & PA-45A-32-04/2018 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Parties
- Prosecutor: PENDAKWA RAYA; Accused: MUHAMMAD SHAFWAN BIN AIDED
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 28 July 2021
- Case Number
- PA-45A-31-04/2018 & PA-45A-32-04/2018 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Drug Offences (dangerous Drugs Act 1952) / High Court Judgment and Sentencing (butterworth) 30 Aug 2021
- Outcome
- Accused convicted on two counts: trafficking methamphetamine (75.23g) under s39B(1)(a) Akta 234; possession of heroin and monoacetylmorphines (7.9g total; 5.3g heroin + 2.6g monoacetylmorphines) under s12(2) Akta 234 (amended charge).
- Legal Topics
- Possession, Trafficking/distribution, Statutory Presumptions, Chain of Custody, Burden of Proof and Prima Facie, Credibility of Police Witnesses, Charge Amendment, Sentencing (mandatory Death; Discretionary Mitigation)
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
PENDAKWA RAYA
Prosecutor
MUHAMMAD SHAFWAN BIN AIDED
Accused
Procedural Posture
Criminal Drug Offences (dangerous Drugs Act 1952) / High Court Judgment and Sentencing (butterworth) 30 Aug 2021
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether prosecution proved a prima facie case for trafficking methamphetamine under s39B(1)(a) Akta 234
- 2 Whether accused had possession and knowledge of seized drugs (s12(2) Akta 234)
- 3 Whether statutory presumption under s37(da)(xvi) (>=50g meth) applied and was rebutted
Ratio Decidendi
Prosecution proved possession and knowledge of the seized drugs; laboratory analysis established 75.23g methamphetamine triggering the rebuttable statutory presumption of trafficking under s37(da)(xvi) which the accused failed to rebut on the balance of probabilities; therefore a prima facie case for trafficking methamphetamine was established and the accused was convicted under s39B(1)(a) (resulting in mandatory sentence under s39B(2)); the heroin/monoacetylmorphines charge lacked evidence of distribution and was amended to possession under s12(2)/s39A(2) and convicted accordingly.
Court Disposition
Accused convicted on two counts: trafficking methamphetamine (75.23g) under s39B(1)(a) Akta 234; possession of heroin and monoacetylmorphines (7.9g total; 5.3g heroin + 2.6g monoacetylmorphines) under s12(2) Akta 234 (amended charge).
Orders
- Sentence of death by hanging imposed for conviction under s39B(1)(a)/s39B(2) (methamphetamine 75.23g)
- Sentence of 12 years' imprisonment and 10 strokes of the rotan for possession under s12(2)/s39A(2), to run from date of arrest (as ordered)
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment