NAZRI BIN MOHAMMAD
The court held prosecution proved a prima facie case: chemical analysis identified substantial quantities of heroin and monoacetylmorphines; the drugs were found in an open bag on the front passenger seat in immediate physical proximity to the accused, the sole occupant, establishing possession and knowledge (actual possession or statutory custody/control), and the quantity supported inference of distribution; defence explanations were uncorroborated and failed to raise reasonable doubt; accordingly accused convicted under s39B(1)(a) Dangerous Drugs Act 1952 and sentenced to life imprisonment (with no sebat due to age) under the post‑Abolition sentencing framework.
- Citation
- BL-45A-25-12/2023 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Parties
- Prosecution: PENDAKWA RAYA; Accused: NAZRI BIN MOHAMMAD
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 30 January 2026
- Case Number
- BL-45A-25-12/2023 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Dangerous Drugs / Judgment and Sentencing
- Outcome
- Accused convicted
- Legal Topics
- Possession, Knowledge of Drug, Trafficking/distribution, Prima Facie Burden, Chain of Custody, Statutory Presumption S37(d), Alibi/defence Credibility, Abolition of Mandatory Death Penalty
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
PENDAKWA RAYA
Prosecution
NAZRI BIN MOHAMMAD
Accused
Procedural Posture
Criminal Dangerous Drugs / Judgment and Sentencing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether prosecution established a prima facie case under s39B(1)(a) Dangerous Drugs Act 1952
- 2 Whether accused had possession and knowledge of the drugs
- 3 Whether quantity and circumstances proved distribution/trafficking element
Ratio Decidendi
The court held prosecution proved a prima facie case: chemical analysis identified substantial quantities of heroin and monoacetylmorphines; the drugs were found in an open bag on the front passenger seat in immediate physical proximity to the accused, the sole occupant, establishing possession and knowledge (actual possession or statutory custody/control), and the quantity supported inference of distribution; defence explanations were uncorroborated and failed to raise reasonable doubt; accordingly accused convicted under s39B(1)(a) Dangerous Drugs Act 1952 and sentenced to life imprisonment (with no sebat due to age) under the post‑Abolition sentencing framework.
Court Disposition
Accused convicted
Orders
- Convicted under Section 39B(1)(a) Dangerous Drugs Act 1952
- Sentenced to life imprisonment under Section 34 in light of Act abolishing mandatory death penalty; no corporal punishment imposed due to accused being over 50 years old
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment