PENDAKWARAYA FATIN HANUM BINTI ABDUL HADI MOHD ZAMRI BIN SAIDIN
For charge 1 the prosecution proved actual physical possession and knowledge: cannabis (488g) was found in the accused's motorcycle carrier which he rode and owned; statutory quantity supports trafficking inference so accused was ordered to enter defence. For charge 2 the prosecution failed to prove exclusive possession or control of the cabinet or that the accused had animus possidendi over its contents; photocopied title was inadmissible and the recorded statement of the deceased had limited probative value; DNA and a key on a keyring were insufficient to establish possession or knowledge — charge 2 discharged without calling accused to defend.
- Citation
- WA-45A-34-06/2018 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Parties
- Prosecution: Pendakwa Raya (Public Prosecutor); Accused/defendant: Mohd Zamri bin Saidin
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 13 October 2020
- Case Number
- WA-45A-34-06/2018 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal — Drug Trafficking (dangerous Drugs Act 1952) / End of Prosecution Case — Prima Facie Ruling (charge 1: Accused Ordered to Enter Defence; Charge 2: Discharged)
- Outcome
- Charge 1: Prima facie case established — accused ordered to enter defence. Charge 2: No prima facie case — accused discharged and acquitted without being called to enter defence.
- Legal Topics
- Possession and Custody, Presumptions Under S37(d) Dangerous Drugs Act 1952, Prima Facie Test at Close of Prosecution (s180 Criminal Procedure Code), Admissibility of Statements of Deceased (s32(1)(i) Evidence Act), Secondary Documentary Evidence (ss61, 63, 65 Evidence Act), Element of Knowledge, Trafficking/distribution (s39 B)
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Pendakwa Raya (Public Prosecutor)
Prosecution
Mohd Zamri bin Saidin
Accused/defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal — Drug Trafficking (dangerous Drugs Act 1952) / End of Prosecution Case — Prima Facie Ruling (charge 1: Accused Ordered to Enter Defence; Charge 2: Discharged)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether prosecution proved a prima facie case for charge 1 (488g cannabis)
- 2 Whether prosecution proved a prima facie case for charge 2 (37,883g cannabis)
- 3 Whether cannabis found in motorcycle was in accused's possession and he had knowledge
Ratio Decidendi
For charge 1 the prosecution proved actual physical possession and knowledge: cannabis (488g) was found in the accused's motorcycle carrier which he rode and owned; statutory quantity supports trafficking inference so accused was ordered to enter defence. For charge 2 the prosecution failed to prove exclusive possession or control of the cabinet or that the accused had animus possidendi over its contents; photocopied title was inadmissible and the recorded statement of the deceased had limited probative value; DNA and a key on a keyring were insufficient to establish possession or knowledge — charge 2 discharged without calling accused to defend.
Court Disposition
Charge 1: Prima facie case established — accused ordered to enter defence. Charge 2: No prima facie case — accused discharged and acquitted without being called to enter defence.
Orders
- Charge 1: Accused Mohd Zamri bin Saidin ordered to enter his defence on offence of trafficking 488 grams Cannabis under s39B(1)(a) Dangerous Drugs Act 1952.
- Charge 2: Accused Mohd Zamri bin Saidin discharged and released without being called to enter his defence in respect of 37,883 grams Cannabis (no prima facie case).
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment