[Timbalan (TPR), Jabatan Peguam Negara] 1. ) MOHD SAIFUDDIN BIN MAMAT@FAUZI 2. ) NURUL AKILAH BINTI SALIM
Prosecution proved beyond prima facie threshold that accused 1 had control and knowledge of the seized drugs: bag worn by accused 1 contained drugs and his personal documents; chemical analysis confirmed scheduled drugs and chain of custody was not broken; accused 2 had no custody/control and was acquitted; defence claims including D37 and alleged tampering were late, unsupported, and constituted afterthoughts insufficient to raise reasonable doubt; therefore accused 1 convicted on three amended s.12(2) Dangerous Drugs Act charges (two punishable under s.39A(1)) and sentenced accordingly.
- Citation
- CB-83D-1729-12/2022 (Mahkamah Majistret)
- Parties
- Prosecution: Pendakwa Raya; Tertuduh Pertama (accused 1): Mohd Saifuddin bin Mamat @ Fauzi; Tertuduh Kedua (accused 2): Nurul Akilah binti Salim
- Court
- Magistrates' Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 28 April 2025
- Case Number
- CB-83D-1729-12/2022 (Mahkamah Majistret)
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Dangerous Drugs (dangerous Drugs Act 1952) / End of Trial: Judgment and Sentencing (magistrate Court)
- Outcome
- Tertuduh Pertama convicted on three amended charges under s.12(2) Dangerous Drugs Act 1952 (two counts punishable under s.39A(1)); Tertuduh Kedua acquitted and discharged.
- Legal Topics
- Possession and Knowledge, Prima Facie Test, Chain of Custody, Cross Examination Obligations, Police Misconduct/entrapment, Sentencing and Mitigation
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Pendakwa Raya
Prosecution
Mohd Saifuddin bin Mamat @ Fauzi
Tertuduh Pertama (accused 1)
Nurul Akilah binti Salim
Tertuduh Kedua (accused 2)
Procedural Posture
Criminal Dangerous Drugs (dangerous Drugs Act 1952) / End of Trial: Judgment and Sentencing (magistrate Court)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether prosecution established a prima facie case against each accused
- 2 Whether the seized drugs were in the possession of the accused (control and knowledge)
- 3 Whether chain of custody and chemical analysis proved the items were scheduled dangerous drugs
Ratio Decidendi
Prosecution proved beyond prima facie threshold that accused 1 had control and knowledge of the seized drugs: bag worn by accused 1 contained drugs and his personal documents; chemical analysis confirmed scheduled drugs and chain of custody was not broken; accused 2 had no custody/control and was acquitted; defence claims including D37 and alleged tampering were late, unsupported, and constituted afterthoughts insufficient to raise reasonable doubt; therefore accused 1 convicted on three amended s.12(2) Dangerous Drugs Act charges (two punishable under s.39A(1)) and sentenced accordingly.
Court Disposition
Tertuduh Pertama convicted on three amended charges under s.12(2) Dangerous Drugs Act 1952 (two counts punishable under s.39A(1)); Tertuduh Kedua acquitted and discharged.
Orders
- CB-83D-1264-09/2022: Convicted - imprisonment 32 months and 3 strokes of the cane
- CB-83D-1729-12/2022 (first charge): Convicted - imprisonment 32 months and 3 strokes of the cane
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment