MUHAMMAD FARULNAIM BIN NORDIN
Court found prosecution proved uninterrupted chain of custody and credible, consistent witness testimony that the methamphetamine (6.62g) was found in the accused's shorts pocket; s.37(d) presumption applied and accused's knowledge was established; defence account was inconsistent and improbable; therefore accused guilty beyond reasonable doubt and convicted; sentence imposed 30 months imprisonment from date of conviction and three strokes of the cane; execution of sentence suspended on increased bail and reporting conditions.
- Citation
- JE-83D-356-07/2024 (Mahkamah Majistret)
- Parties
- Prosecution: Pejabat Pengarah Pendakwaan Negeri Johor; Accused: Muhammad Farulnaim bin Nordin
- Court
- Magistrates' Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 30 July 2025
- Case Number
- JE-83D-356-07/2024 (Mahkamah Majistret)
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Dangerous Drugs / Conviction and Sentencing (judgment Delivered)
- Outcome
- Accused convicted and sentenced
- Legal Topics
- Possession of Controlled Drug, Chain of Custody, Statutory Presumptions (possession and Knowledge), Sentencing, Bail / Stay of Execution
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Pejabat Pengarah Pendakwaan Negeri Johor
Prosecution
Muhammad Farulnaim bin Nordin
Accused
Procedural Posture
Criminal Dangerous Drugs / Conviction and Sentencing (judgment Delivered)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the prosecution proved possession of methamphetamine beyond reasonable doubt
- 2 Whether chain of custody of exhibits was continuous and free from contamination
- 3 Whether the accused had knowledge of the presence of the drug
Ratio Decidendi
Court found prosecution proved uninterrupted chain of custody and credible, consistent witness testimony that the methamphetamine (6.62g) was found in the accused's shorts pocket; s.37(d) presumption applied and accused's knowledge was established; defence account was inconsistent and improbable; therefore accused guilty beyond reasonable doubt and convicted; sentence imposed 30 months imprisonment from date of conviction and three strokes of the cane; execution of sentence suspended on increased bail and reporting conditions.
Court Disposition
Accused convicted and sentenced
Orders
- Convicted of an offence under s.12(2) Dangerous Drugs Act 1952 read with s.39A(1)(r); sentenced to 30 months imprisonment from date of conviction (22 September 2025)
- Ordered to be whipped three (3) strokes
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment