MOHD FAKHRULRAZI BIN ABDULLAH

MOHD FAKHRULRAZI BIN ABDULLAH

Chemical analysis established identity and quantities of drugs, chain of custody was intact, accused was sole occupier of the room at the time of arrest, possessed key and safe password, and thus had control, custody and knowledge of the drugs; defence failed to raise reasonable doubt given unreliable witness evidence and absence of credible proof of third‑party access; accordingly guilty verdicts and sentences follow.

Citation
JJ-83D-7-01/2023 (Mahkamah Majistret)
Parties
Prosecution: Pendakwa Raya; Accused: Mohd Fakhrulrazi Bin Abdullah
Court
Magistrates' Court
Jurisdiction
Malaysia
Judgment Date
24 February 2026
Case Number
JJ-83D-7-01/2023 (Mahkamah Majistret)
Procedural Posture
Criminal Drug Possession / Trial Judgment and Sentencing
Outcome
Accused convicted on charges of possession of dangerous drugs and poisons
Legal Topics
Possession of Controlled Substances, Chain of Custody, Admissibility of Statements and Cautions, Prima Facie Burden, Sentencing and Suspension of Execution
Source Language
Malay/English
Criminal Law Narcotics Law Evidence Law Criminal Procedure Possession of Controlled Substances Chain of Custody Admissibility of Statements and Cautions Prima Facie Burden +1 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 25 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Pendakwa Raya

Prosecution

Mohd Fakhrulrazi Bin Abdullah

Accused

Procedural Posture

Criminal Drug Possession / Trial Judgment and Sentencing

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the seized substances were dangerous drugs and poisons as charged
  2. 2 Whether the accused had possession, control and knowledge of the drugs
  3. 3 Whether the prosecution maintained chain of custody and admissibility of evidence including statements

Ratio Decidendi

Chemical analysis established identity and quantities of drugs, chain of custody was intact, accused was sole occupier of the room at the time of arrest, possessed key and safe password, and thus had control, custody and knowledge of the drugs; defence failed to raise reasonable doubt given unreliable witness evidence and absence of credible proof of third‑party access; accordingly guilty verdicts and sentences follow.

Court Disposition

Accused convicted on charges of possession of dangerous drugs and poisons

Orders

  • Convicted under s.12(2) Dangerous Drugs Act 1952 (to be punished under s.39A(1)) and s.30(3) Poisons Act 1952 as per amended charge P2
  • Sentence on first charge: 2 years imprisonment and 3 strokes of the rotan