KIM KAI SIONG
The prosecution failed to establish a prima facie case under section 180 CPC because evidence was inconsistent and insufficient to prove exclusive possession and knowledge: contemporaneous documents conflicted with oral testimony, other persons had access to the premises and were not properly investigated or called, and the police investigation was inadequate, producing reasonable doubt as to the accused's guilt; accordingly the accused was acquitted and discharged on all charges.
- Citation
- AA-45A-11-10/2018 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Parties
- Prosecution: Public Prosecutor; Accused: Kim Kai Siong
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 21 January 2022
- Case Number
- AA-45A-11-10/2018 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Drug Offences / Post Prosecution Stage Under Section 180 CPC (consideration of Prima Facie Case)
- Outcome
- Accused acquitted and discharged of all five charges
- Legal Topics
- Possession of Drugs, Trafficking, Prima Facie Standard (s.180 Cpc), Search and Seizure, Investigation Adequacy, Presumption Under S.37 DDA
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Public Prosecutor
Prosecution
Kim Kai Siong
Accused
Procedural Posture
Criminal Drug Offences / Post Prosecution Stage Under Section 180 CPC (consideration of Prima Facie Case)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the prosecution made out a prima facie case under section 180 CPC
- 2 Whether the accused had possession and knowledge of the dangerous drugs and poison charged
- 3 Whether the prosecution investigation was fair and sufficiently thorough to attribute exclusive possession to the accused
Ratio Decidendi
The prosecution failed to establish a prima facie case under section 180 CPC because evidence was inconsistent and insufficient to prove exclusive possession and knowledge: contemporaneous documents conflicted with oral testimony, other persons had access to the premises and were not properly investigated or called, and the police investigation was inadequate, producing reasonable doubt as to the accused's guilt; accordingly the accused was acquitted and discharged on all charges.
Court Disposition
Accused acquitted and discharged of all five charges
Orders
- Accused acquitted and discharged of all five charges
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment