JAIME JAMILAH BINTI ABDULLAH

JAIME JAMILAH BINTI ABDULLAH

Prosecution proved beyond reasonable doubt that the accused had custody and control of the knife with knowledge of its nature while in a public place and produced corroborative exhibits and photographs; the defence was a mere denial and failed to raise reasonable doubt, therefore guilty under s6(1) ABKLSB 1958.

Citation
WA-62-106-10/2023 (Mahkamah Sesyen)
Parties
Prosecutor: Pendakwa Raya; Accused: Jaime Jamilah binti Abdullah
Court
Sessions Court
Jurisdiction
Malaysia
Judgment Date
21 October 2024
Case Number
WA-62-106-10/2023 (Mahkamah Sesyen)
Procedural Posture
Criminal – Possession of Offensive Weapon (s6(1) Akta Bahan Kakisan Dan Bahan Letupan Dan Senjata Berbahaya 1958) / Convicted and Sentenced; Appeal Lodged
Outcome
Accused found guilty under s6(1) Akta Bahan Kakisan Dan Bahan Letupan dan Senjata Berbahaya 1958 and convicted
Legal Topics
Possession of Offensive Weapon, Section 6(1) ABKLSB 1958, Prima Facie Assessment (s180 Ktj), Sentencing Principles
Source Language
Malay/English
Criminal Law Public Order Weapons Law Procedural Law Possession of Offensive Weapon Section 6(1) ABKLSB 1958 Prima Facie Assessment (s180 Ktj) Sentencing Principles

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 17 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Pendakwa Raya

Prosecutor

Jaime Jamilah binti Abdullah

Accused

Procedural Posture

Criminal – Possession of Offensive Weapon (s6(1) Akta Bahan Kakisan Dan Bahan Letupan Dan Senjata Berbahaya 1958) / Convicted and Sentenced; Appeal Lodged

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the accused had possession of the knife (physical and mental elements)
  2. 2 Whether the knife was carried in a public place without lawful authority
  3. 3 Whether prosecution had established a prima facie case at close of prosecution

Ratio Decidendi

Prosecution proved beyond reasonable doubt that the accused had custody and control of the knife with knowledge of its nature while in a public place and produced corroborative exhibits and photographs; the defence was a mere denial and failed to raise reasonable doubt, therefore guilty under s6(1) ABKLSB 1958.

Court Disposition

Accused found guilty under s6(1) Akta Bahan Kakisan Dan Bahan Letupan dan Senjata Berbahaya 1958 and convicted

Orders

  • Convicted under s6(1) ABKLSB 1958
  • Sentenced to 6 years imprisonment from date of arrest