SHATIS NAIR A/L RAVINDRAN NAIR NESASELVAM A/L MUTHUSAMY

SHATIS NAIR A/L RAVINDRAN NAIR NESASELVAM A/L MUTHUSAMY

Both consolidated appeals were dismissed because appellants failed to show the Sessions Court acted on a wrong principle, omitted relevant matters, or made an unreasonable estimate. Plaintiff failed to prove on evidence loss of earning capacity and full private medical expenses; the one‑third principle for private hospital costs applied. Defendant's challenges to specific quantum were not sufficient to displace the trial court's reasonable awards within established compendium ranges; thus the Sessions Court awards were affirmed.

Citation
JA-12B-18-05/2022 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
Parties
Perayu/plaintif: Shatis Nair a/l Ravindran Nair; Responden/defendan: Nesaselvam a/l Muthusamy
Court
High Court
Jurisdiction
Malaysia
Judgment Date
4 January 2024
Case Number
JA-12B-18-05/2022 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
Procedural Posture
Appeal (consolidated) / Judgment on Consolidated Appeals (high Court)
Outcome
Both appeals dismissed; Sessions Court awards upheld; appeals dismissed without costs.
Legal Topics
Quantum of Damages, Loss of Earning Capacity, Medical Expenses, Assessment of General Damages, Standard of Appellate Intervention
Source Language
Malay/English
Tort Personal Injury Civil Procedure Appeal Quantum of Damages Loss of Earning Capacity Medical Expenses Assessment of General Damages +1 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 11 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 11
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Shatis Nair a/l Ravindran Nair

Perayu/plaintif

Nesaselvam a/l Muthusamy

Responden/defendan

Procedural Posture

Appeal (consolidated) / Judgment on Consolidated Appeals (high Court)

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the Sessions Court erred in assessing quantum of damages
  2. 2 Whether plaintiff proved loss of earning capacity and entitlement to full medical bills
  3. 3 Whether awards for residual pain, stiffness, scars, muscle wasting, femur shortening, loss of earnings and living expenses were excessive or insufficient

Ratio Decidendi

Both consolidated appeals were dismissed because appellants failed to show the Sessions Court acted on a wrong principle, omitted relevant matters, or made an unreasonable estimate. Plaintiff failed to prove on evidence loss of earning capacity and full private medical expenses; the one‑third principle for private hospital costs applied. Defendant's challenges to specific quantum were not sufficient to displace the trial court's reasonable awards within established compendium ranges; thus the Sessions Court awards were affirmed.

Court Disposition

Both appeals dismissed; Sessions Court awards upheld; appeals dismissed without costs.

Orders

  • Both consolidated appeals dismissed
  • The entirety of the Sessions Court decision is affirmed