SYED SHAH IQMAL BIN SYED MOHD SHAIFUL

SYED SHAH IQMAL BIN SYED MOHD SHAIFUL

Court found prosecution proved intercourse and penetration but failed to prove absence of consent beyond the prima facie standard because complainant's testimony was not 'unusually convincing' and was undermined by significant inconsistencies between her conduct and her account, the long delay in reporting and neutral/dated medical evidence; therefore prima facie case was not established and accused was discharged without being called to enter defence.

Citation
BA-62JS-10-12/2020 (Mahkamah Sesyen)
Parties
Prosecutor: Pendakwa Raya; Accused: Syed Shah Iqmal bin Syed Mohd Shaiful (KPT:951002035573)
Court
Sessions Court
Jurisdiction
Malaysia
Judgment Date
30 August 2024
Case Number
BA-62JS-10-12/2020 (Mahkamah Sesyen)
Procedural Posture
Criminal Rape (s.376(1) Penal Code) / End of Prosecution Case Accused Discharged Without Being Called to Enter Defence
Outcome
Accused discharged and released at end of prosecution case; not called to enter defence.
Legal Topics
Rape, Consent, Corroboration, Expert Medical Evidence, Delay in Reporting
Source Language
Malay/English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 9 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Pendakwa Raya

Prosecutor

Syed Shah Iqmal bin Syed Mohd Shaiful (KPT:951002035573)

Accused

Procedural Posture

Criminal Rape (s.376(1) Penal Code) / End of Prosecution Case Accused Discharged Without Being Called to Enter Defence

  1. 1 Whether prosecution proved absence of consent beyond prima facie standard at end of prosecution case
  2. 2 Whether complainant's evidence was 'unusually convincing' or required corroboration
  3. 3 Impact of delay in reporting and late medical examination on weight of medical evidence

Ratio Decidendi

Court found prosecution proved intercourse and penetration but failed to prove absence of consent beyond the prima facie standard because complainant's testimony was not 'unusually convincing' and was undermined by significant inconsistencies between her conduct and her account, the long delay in reporting and neutral/dated medical evidence; therefore prima facie case was not established and accused was discharged without being called to enter defence.

Court Disposition

Accused discharged and released at end of prosecution case; not called to enter defence.

Orders

  • Accused Syed Shah Iqmal bin Syed Mohd Shaiful discharged and released without being called to enter defence on the charge under s.376(1) Penal Code.