SENG SAN BING SATIN STRAITS SDN. BHD. PIHAK TERKILAN Jaimie Sia Zui Keng

SENG SAN BING SATIN STRAITS SDN. BHD. PIHAK TERKILAN Jaimie Sia Zui Keng

Order 63A r.15(3) of the Rules of Court 2012 permits the Registrar to rectify erroneous information in the Court's e‑Filing system; such rectification corrects a clerical entry and does not invalidate or alter the enforceability of the existing JDS order against the judgment debtor, therefore the appeal is dismissed.

Citation
WA-37J-17-03/2024 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
Parties
Judgment Creditor: SENG SAN BING; Judgment Debtor: SATIN STRAITS SDN. BHD.
Court
High Court
Jurisdiction
Malaysia
Judgment Date
14 May 2025
Case Number
WA-37J-17-03/2024 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
Procedural Posture
Application for Execution (wa 37 J 17 03/2024) / Appeal to High Court Judge in Chambers; Judgment Dismissing Appeal
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Rectification of Court Records, Order 63 a Rule 15(3) Rules of Court 2012, Res Judicata, Role of Registrar, Examination of Judgment Debtor
Source Language
Malay/English
Civil Procedure Court Administration Electronic Filing Rectification of Court Records Order 63 a Rule 15(3) Rules of Court 2012 Res Judicata Role of Registrar Examination of Judgment Debtor

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

SENG SAN BING

Judgment Creditor

SATIN STRAITS SDN. BHD.

Judgment Debtor

Procedural Posture

Application for Execution (wa 37 J 17 03/2024) / Appeal to High Court Judge in Chambers; Judgment Dismissing Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the Registrar may rectify information entered in the Court's e‑Filing system under Order 63A r.15(3) ROC
  2. 2 Whether such rectification circumvents or alters an existing Judgment Debtor Summons (JDS) order or is barred by res judicata/functus officio
  3. 3 Whether clerical error in e‑filing can be corrected without affecting enforceability of the substantive judgment

Ratio Decidendi

Order 63A r.15(3) of the Rules of Court 2012 permits the Registrar to rectify erroneous information in the Court's e‑Filing system; such rectification corrects a clerical entry and does not invalidate or alter the enforceability of the existing JDS order against the judgment debtor, therefore the appeal is dismissed.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed
  • Costs of RM 3,000 to be paid by the appellant, subject to allocatur