COOL TREASURE SDN. BHD. (NO.PENDAFTARAN SYARIKAT : 1107739-T) 1. ) PENGARAH TANAH DAN GALIAN WILAYAH PERSEKUTUAN 2. ) PENDAFTARAN HAJMILIK WILAYAH PERSEKUTUAN 3. ) TAY KIM LENG (NO. K/P : 750803-01-7045)
The Registrar acted within statutory discretion under s320(1)(a) NLC to enter and retain the Registrar's caveat to prevent fraud and preserve the status quo while the PDRM investigation under s420 Penal Code remained ongoing; the court will not cancel the caveat at this stage because the Registrar's exercise of...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- WA-24NCVC-2693-12/2019 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Parties
- Appellant / Plaintiff: COOL TREASURE SDN. BHD.; Respondent / Defendant: PENGARAH TANAH DAN GALIAN WILAYAH PERSEKUTUAN; Respondent / Defendant: PENDAFTAR HAKMILIK WILAYAH PERSEKUTUAN; Respondent / Defendant: TAY KIM LENG
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 10 July 2020
- Case Number
- WA-24NCVC-2693-12/2019 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Procedural Posture
- Civil (land Law) — Originating Summons Re: Registrar's Caveat Under National Land Code / High Court Judgment on Originating Summons (challenge to Registrar's Caveat); Appeal Filed
- Outcome
- Originating summons dismissed; Registrar's caveat maintained pending completion of PDRM investigation
- Legal Topics
- Registrar's Caveat, National Land Code Sections 320, 321, 417, 418, Police Investigation (s420 Penal Code), Bona Fide Purchaser, Discretion of Public Officers
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
COOL TREASURE SDN. BHD.
Appellant / Plaintiff
PENGARAH TANAH DAN GALIAN WILAYAH PERSEKUTUAN
Respondent / Defendant
PENDAFTAR HAKMILIK WILAYAH PERSEKUTUAN
Respondent / Defendant
TAY KIM LENG
Respondent / Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil (land Law) — Originating Summons Re: Registrar's Caveat Under National Land Code / High Court Judgment on Originating Summons (challenge to Registrar's Caveat); Appeal Filed
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Registrar's caveat (Registrar's caveat) ought to be cancelled under s321(3) of the National Land Code in light of the registered proprietorship of the appellant
- 2 Whether the Registrar properly exercised discretion under s320(1)(a) NLC to enter and retain a Registrar's caveat pending a police investigation into alleged fraud
- 3 Whether withdrawal of a private caveat by a third party negates the justification for a Registrar's caveat
Ratio Decidendi
The Registrar acted within statutory discretion under s320(1)(a) NLC to enter and retain the Registrar's caveat to prevent fraud and preserve the status quo while the PDRM investigation under s420 Penal Code remained ongoing; the court will not cancel the caveat at this stage because the Registrar's exercise of discretion was proper and justified by the ongoing investigation.
Court Disposition
Originating summons dismissed; Registrar's caveat maintained pending completion of PDRM investigation
Orders
- Registrar's caveat (Kaveat Pendaftar) shall remain in place until the completion of the PDRM investigation into report Petaling Jaya RPT:5333/2019
- Originating summons to cancel the Registrar's caveat is dismissed at this stage
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment