Syed Mohammad Ali Bin Hassainar SUSPEK 1. ) Suhana Binti Ismail 2. ) Mohamad Fazli bin Abdul Rahim 3. ) Tengku Fahmy bin Tengku Mohd Ariffin 4. ) Norhaida binti Mat Non 5. ) Sheikh Nurul Islam 6. ) Siti Khadijah binti Ibrahim 7. ) SAMSUL BA
The magistrate held that the substitute SPRM officer present satisfactorily answered court queries so the absence of the original investigating officer did not invalidate the application; timing and registration of the remand application meant detention of OYDS1 and OYDS2 fell within the 24‑hour limit; on the basis of nexus to the investigation (including alleged RM8 million transactions) and specific investigative needs the court granted remand for three days for OYDS1 and OYDS2 to allow searches, seizures, forensic analysis and further inquiries.
- Citation
- BA-89RE-3580-09/2025 (Mahkamah Majistret)
- Parties
- Prosecution: Suruhanjaya Pencegahan Rasuah Malaysia (SPRM) Negeri Selangor; Accused: Suhana binti Ismail; Accused: Mohamad Fafzli bin Abdul Rahim; Accused: 11 other OYDS (others suspected)
- Court
- Magistrates' Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 10 September 2025
- Case Number
- BA-89RE-3580-09/2025 (Mahkamah Majistret)
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Remand Application Under Section 117 CPC / Magistrate Remand Hearing (magistrate's Decision)
- Outcome
- Remand granted for 3 days in respect of OYDS1 (Suhana binti Ismail) and OYDS2 (Mohamad Fafzli bin Abdul Rahim).
- Legal Topics
- Remand Application, Delay/exceeding 24 Hours, Attendance of Investigating Officer, Search and Seizure, Forensic Phone Analysis, Bank Document Examination, Bribery Syndicate Investigation
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Suruhanjaya Pencegahan Rasuah Malaysia (SPRM) Negeri Selangor
Prosecution
Suhana binti Ismail
Accused
Mohamad Fafzli bin Abdul Rahim
Accused
11 other OYDS (others suspected)
Accused
Procedural Posture
Criminal Remand Application Under Section 117 CPC / Magistrate Remand Hearing (magistrate's Decision)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether detention of OYDS1 and OYDS2 exceeded 24 hours without magistrate order
- 2 Whether non‑attendance of the original investigating officer vitiates remand application
- 3 Whether there is sufficient nexus and necessity to justify remand for purposes of investigation including searches, seizures and forensic examinations
Ratio Decidendi
The magistrate held that the substitute SPRM officer present satisfactorily answered court queries so the absence of the original investigating officer did not invalidate the application; timing and registration of the remand application meant detention of OYDS1 and OYDS2 fell within the 24‑hour limit; on the basis of nexus to the investigation (including alleged RM8 million transactions) and specific investigative needs the court granted remand for three days for OYDS1 and OYDS2 to allow searches, seizures, forensic analysis and further inquiries.
Court Disposition
Remand granted for 3 days in respect of OYDS1 (Suhana binti Ismail) and OYDS2 (Mohamad Fafzli bin Abdul Rahim).
Orders
- Permohonan penahanan (reman) dibenarkan selama 3 hari terhadap OYDS1 dan OYDS2 bermula 10/09/2025 sehingga 12/09/2025; tahanan di lokap SPRM Negeri Selangor.
- Permohonan reman disahkan walaupun pegawai penyiasat asal tidak hadir kerana pegawai SPRM pengganti dapat menjawab pertanyaan mahkamah.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment