WONG WENG FOO & CO LONDON BISCUITS BERHAD (IN LIQUIDATION) PIHAK TERKILAN Jabatan Insolvensi Malaysia
The liquidator acted within his statutory powers and commercial judgment to preserve and maximise asset value; retention of employees and payments were justified by the commercial objective of effecting a packaged sale and caused no loss; the Validation Order and relevant rules justify the remuneration and appointments; procedural non-compliance (if any) did not cause substantial injustice and were curable; applicant failed to show cause for removal; therefore PW 282 is dismissed and PW 139 is allowed to appoint Victor Saw as successor liquidator and discharge Lim San Peen.
- Citation
- WA-28PW-282-10/2021 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Parties
- Liquidator / Applicant (pw 139): Lim San Peen; Applicant / Creditor (pw 282): Wong Weng Foo & Co.; Company / Respondent: London Biscuits Berhad (in Liquidation)
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 3 October 2022
- Case Number
- WA-28PW-282-10/2021 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Procedural Posture
- Companies (winding Up) Applications (removal and Appointment of Liquidator; Ancillary Declaratory Reliefs) / Hearing and Judgment on Interlocutory Summonses (pw 139 and PW 282)
- Outcome
- PW 282 dismissed with costs; PW 139 allowed; Victor Saw appointed as liquidator; Lim San Peen discharged
- Legal Topics
- Removal and Appointment of Liquidator, Liquidator's Duties and Powers, Proofs of Debt (pod) and Creditors' Rights, Validation Orders and Sanction of Remuneration, Companies (winding Up) Rules Compliance
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Lim San Peen
Liquidator / Applicant (pw 139)
Wong Weng Foo & Co.
Applicant / Creditor (pw 282)
London Biscuits Berhad (in Liquidation)
Company / Respondent
Procedural Posture
Companies (winding Up) Applications (removal and Appointment of Liquidator; Ancillary Declaratory Reliefs) / Hearing and Judgment on Interlocutory Summonses (pw 139 and PW 282)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the liquidator wrongfully and unnecessarily retained employees and made unlawful payments
- 2 Whether acceptance of advances and payments (including RM100,000) were unlawful
- 3 Whether Rule 160 WUR (separate trading account) was breached
Ratio Decidendi
The liquidator acted within his statutory powers and commercial judgment to preserve and maximise asset value; retention of employees and payments were justified by the commercial objective of effecting a packaged sale and caused no loss; the Validation Order and relevant rules justify the remuneration and appointments; procedural non-compliance (if any) did not cause substantial injustice and were curable; applicant failed to show cause for removal; therefore PW 282 is dismissed and PW 139 is allowed to appoint Victor Saw as successor liquidator and discharge Lim San Peen.
Court Disposition
PW 282 dismissed with costs; PW 139 allowed; Victor Saw appointed as liquidator; Lim San Peen discharged
Orders
- PW 282 dismissed with costs
- PW 139 allowed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment