1. ) MAJIDEE PARK AUTO SPARES & SERVICES SDN BHD 2. ) JAYAPALASINGAM A/L KANDIAH 1. ) N THANAVATHY A/P RAJAH 2. ) KETUA PENGARAH JABATAN INSOLVENSI MALAYSIA
The Court of Appeal allowed the appeal, set aside the High Court order removing the 2nd appellant as liquidator because the licence renewal was subsequently judicially validated with retrospective effect and the High Court's findings of unreasonable delay were unsupported by contemporaneous documents; additionally the High Court had failed to show that the requisite notice to creditors had been given, a fatal procedural defect. Removal was therefore unjustified and the order was set aside.
- Citation
- J-01(A)-408-07/2023 (Mahkamah Rayuan)
- Parties
- 1st Appellant: Majidee Park Auto Spares & Services Sdn Bhd (Dalam Likuidasi); 2nd Appellant: Jayapalasingam a/l Kandiah (Pelikuidasi yang dilantik); 1st Respondent: N Thanavathy a/p Rajah; 2nd Respondent: Ketua Pengarah Insolvensi (Director General of Insolvency)
- Court
- A
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 29 April 2025
- Case Number
- J-01(A)-408-07/2023 (Mahkamah Rayuan)
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal (companies/insolvency) / Court of Appeal Judgment on Appeal From Johor Bahru High Court
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; High Court order of 26.6.2023 removing 2nd appellant as liquidator set aside
- Legal Topics
- Removal of Liquidator, Winding Up, Licensing of Insolvency Practitioners, Service of Notice to Creditors, Duties and Promptitude of Liquidator
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Majidee Park Auto Spares & Services Sdn Bhd (Dalam Likuidasi)
1st Appellant
Jayapalasingam a/l Kandiah (Pelikuidasi yang dilantik)
2nd Appellant
N Thanavathy a/p Rajah
1st Respondent
Ketua Pengarah Insolvensi (Director General of Insolvency)
2nd Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal (companies/insolvency) / Court of Appeal Judgment on Appeal From Johor Bahru High Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether non-renewal of liquidator licence justified removal
- 2 Whether an application to remove a liquidator must be supported by all creditors and contributories
- 3 Whether all creditors/contributories were given notice of the removal application
Ratio Decidendi
The Court of Appeal allowed the appeal, set aside the High Court order removing the 2nd appellant as liquidator because the licence renewal was subsequently judicially validated with retrospective effect and the High Court's findings of unreasonable delay were unsupported by contemporaneous documents; additionally the High Court had failed to show that the requisite notice to creditors had been given, a fatal procedural defect. Removal was therefore unjustified and the order was set aside.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; High Court order of 26.6.2023 removing 2nd appellant as liquidator set aside
Orders
- Order of the Johor Bahru High Court dated 26.6.2023 removing Jayapalasingam a/l Kandiah as liquidator is set aside
- Costs awarded to the appellants in the sum of RM10,000.00 subject to allocatur
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment