KHOO CHOOI THUAN 1. ) Loh Kon Fah [Notis Pemberhentian Di Kandungan 14] 2. ) LOH SIEW CHOONG 3. ) Loh Ngee Pin 4. ) Loh Siew Ngoh 5. ) Loh Liong Fah 6. ) Law Kam Sau 7. ) Ngan Peing Kai 8. ) Gunasegaran A/l Suppiah 9. ) Viswanathan A/l M V
The Court held that Respondents failed to show sufficient cause to remove the Applicant; allegations of conflict and unfitness were unproven, the Debt Settlement Agreement was valid and enforceable, Respondents' conduct constituted malicious obstruction, and therefore the Applicant must be permitted to continue as Liquidator until completion; costs RM8,000 awarded to Applicant.
- Citation
- AA-24NCC-19-09/2023 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Parties
- Applicant (liquidator, Lohman Holdings Sdn Bhd): Khoo Chooi Thuan; Respondent 1 (contributory): Loh Kon Fah; Respondent 2 (contributory): Loh Siew Choong
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 13 March 2024
- Case Number
- AA-24NCC-19-09/2023 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Procedural Posture
- Originating Summons / Judgment on Application Under S.445(3) Companies Act 2016
- Outcome
- Applicant's application allowed; Applicant to continue as Liquidator until completion of winding up; costs awarded to Applicant.
- Legal Topics
- Removal of Liquidator, Winding Up (members' Voluntary), Section 445 Companies Act 2016, Conflict of Interest, Debt Settlement Agreement Enforcement, Costs
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Khoo Chooi Thuan
Applicant (liquidator, Lohman Holdings Sdn Bhd)
Loh Kon Fah
Respondent 1 (contributory)
Loh Siew Choong
Respondent 2 (contributory)
Procedural Posture
Originating Summons / Judgment on Application Under S.445(3) Companies Act 2016
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Applicant should continue as Liquidator until completion of winding up
- 2 Whether Respondents have shown cause to remove the Applicant for conflict of interest or unfitness (dishonesty)
- 3 Whether the Debt Settlement Agreement dated 23.03.2023 is legal and enforceable
Ratio Decidendi
The Court held that Respondents failed to show sufficient cause to remove the Applicant; allegations of conflict and unfitness were unproven, the Debt Settlement Agreement was valid and enforceable, Respondents' conduct constituted malicious obstruction, and therefore the Applicant must be permitted to continue as Liquidator until completion; costs RM8,000 awarded to Applicant.
Court Disposition
Applicant's application allowed; Applicant to continue as Liquidator until completion of winding up; costs awarded to Applicant.
Orders
- Applicant's application in Enclosure 1 and 3 is allowed
- Applicant to continue as Liquidator of Lohman Holdings Sdn Bhd until completion of the company's winding-up
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment