1. GAN CHON TAT (NO KP: 590916-03-5397) 2. AONG CHAI NGAA (NO KP: 370302-03-5072) Pentadbir Bersama Harta Pesaka Can Soon Cheow (No KP: 1510525), Si Mati 1. GAM JIN SIM @ GAN GIM SIM (NO KP: 320605-03-5058 / 3756622) 2. GAM JIN SIM @ GAN GI
The Court held the present suit was an attempt to relitigate issues already finally decided in KL High Court Suit 811, no appeal having been taken; absent pleaded fraud or suppression of material evidence the plaintiffs could not re-open the prior decision; the claim therefore constituted an abuse of process and was struck out under O 18 r 19(1)(d) ROC.
- Citation
- DA-22NCVC-28-06/2018 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Parties
- Plaintiff / Co Administrator of Estate of Can Soon Cheow (deceased): Gan Chon Tat; Plaintiff / Co Administrator of Estate of Can Soon Cheow (deceased): Aong Chai Nga; Defendant / Administrator of Estate of Gan Lai Kim (deceased): Gam Jin Sim @ Gan Gim Sim; Defendant (duplicate Entry in Pleadings): Gam Jin Sim @ Gan Gim Sim
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 2 March 2020
- Case Number
- DA-22NCVC-28-06/2018 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Procedural Posture
- Civil (probate and Administration) / Interlocutory Application to Strike Out Under Order 18 Rule 19, High Court (kota Bharu)
- Outcome
- Application in Encl 47 allowed; plaintiff's suit struck out as abuse of process / res judicata
- Legal Topics
- Res Judicata, Issue Estoppel, Abuse of Process, Letters of Administration, Strike Out Under Order 18 Rule 19, Finality of Litigation
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Gan Chon Tat
Plaintiff / Co Administrator of Estate of Can Soon Cheow (deceased)
Aong Chai Nga
Plaintiff / Co Administrator of Estate of Can Soon Cheow (deceased)
Gam Jin Sim @ Gan Gim Sim
Defendant / Administrator of Estate of Gan Lai Kim (deceased)
Gam Jin Sim @ Gan Gim Sim
Defendant (duplicate Entry in Pleadings)
Procedural Posture
Civil (probate and Administration) / Interlocutory Application to Strike Out Under Order 18 Rule 19, High Court (kota Bharu)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the instant claim is barred by res judicata/issue estoppel due to prior KL High Court decision in OS No. 31-VCVC-811-08/2012
- 2 Whether the plaintiffs are attempting to circumvent the appeal process thereby amounting to abuse of process
- 3 Whether the court should re-open prior adjudication absent pleaded fraud or suppression of material evidence
Ratio Decidendi
The Court held the present suit was an attempt to relitigate issues already finally decided in KL High Court Suit 811, no appeal having been taken; absent pleaded fraud or suppression of material evidence the plaintiffs could not re-open the prior decision; the claim therefore constituted an abuse of process and was struck out under O 18 r 19(1)(d) ROC.
Court Disposition
Application in Encl 47 allowed; plaintiff's suit struck out as abuse of process / res judicata
Orders
- Costs awarded to defendants in the sum of RM15,000 subject to allocatur
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment