Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim 1. ) Government of Malaysia 2. ) The National Security Council
The Federal Court has limited inherent jurisdiction to review its own final decisions where a breach of natural justice (including denial of the right to be heard) has caused a grave injustice apparent on the face of the record; the applicant was not given notice or an opportunity to address whether the constitutional questions were academic and on locus standi, that denial left him without an effective remedy and undermined public confidence, therefore the Court set aside its 11 February 2020 decision and ordered the special case reheard.
- Citation
- 08(RS)-1-03/2020(W) (Mahkamah Persekutuan)
- Parties
- Applicant/appellant/plaintiff: Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim; Respondent/defendant: Government of Malaysia; Respondent/defendant: The National Security Council
- Court
- RS
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 10 September 2020
- Case Number
- 08(RS)-1-03/2020(W) (Mahkamah Persekutuan)
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Application for Review of Federal Court Decision / Review Hearing in Federal Court — Application Granted and Special Case Fixed for Rehearing
- Outcome
- Federal Court allowed the review application, set aside its decision dated 11 February 2020 and ordered the special case to be fixed for rehearing; no order as to costs.
- Legal Topics
- Review of Final Court Decision, Inherent Jurisdiction, Natural Justice (right to Be Heard), Locus Standi, Constitutionality of National Security Council Act 2016, Finality V Public Confidence
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim
Applicant/appellant/plaintiff
Government of Malaysia
Respondent/defendant
The National Security Council
Respondent/defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Application for Review of Federal Court Decision / Review Hearing in Federal Court — Application Granted and Special Case Fixed for Rehearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Federal Court has jurisdiction to review its own final decisions
- 2 Whether breach of natural justice (audi alteram partem) is a ground for such review
- 3 Whether applicant was denied the right to be heard on locus standi and academic nature of constitutional questions
Ratio Decidendi
The Federal Court has limited inherent jurisdiction to review its own final decisions where a breach of natural justice (including denial of the right to be heard) has caused a grave injustice apparent on the face of the record; the applicant was not given notice or an opportunity to address whether the constitutional questions were academic and on locus standi, that denial left him without an effective remedy and undermined public confidence, therefore the Court set aside its 11 February 2020 decision and ordered the special case reheard.
Court Disposition
Federal Court allowed the review application, set aside its decision dated 11 February 2020 and ordered the special case to be fixed for rehearing; no order as to costs.
Orders
- Set aside Federal Court decisions dated 11 February 2020 in their entirety
- Special case (reference) to be fixed for rehearing before the Federal Court
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment