SHAWN COLIN DOSS A/L ARPUTHAN DOSS

SHAWN COLIN DOSS A/L ARPUTHAN DOSS

Balancing public interest against accused's mitigation, the court found the offence (robbery with a knife in a public pharmacy) sufficiently serious to require a deterrent sentence; the one transaction rule did not apply because offences occurred on separate occasions, therefore the sentence of 3 years imprisonment and one stroke of whipping was imposed to commence upon conclusion of the accused's existing sentence for case no. BA-62RS-28-05/2025.

Citation
BA-62RS-29-07/2025 (Mahkamah Sesyen)
Parties
Prosecution: Public Prosecutor; Accused: Shawn Colin Doss a/l Arputhan Doss
Court
Sessions Court
Jurisdiction
Malaysia
Judgment Date
9 July 2025
Case Number
BA-62RS-29-07/2025 (Mahkamah Sesyen)
Procedural Posture
Criminal Robbery (penal Code) / Sentencing (appeal Grounds)
Outcome
Accused convicted on guilty plea and sentenced to 3 years imprisonment and whipping (1 stroke), sentence to commence upon conclusion of sentence for case no. BA-62RS-28-05/2025.
Legal Topics
Robbery, Concurrent Vs Consecutive Sentences, Mitigation and Guilty Plea, Commencement of Sentence, One Transaction Rule, Totality Principle
Source Language
Malay/English
Criminal Law Sentencing Criminal Procedure Robbery Concurrent Vs Consecutive Sentences Mitigation and Guilty Plea Commencement of Sentence One Transaction Rule +1 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 12 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Public Prosecutor

Prosecution

Shawn Colin Doss a/l Arputhan Doss

Accused

Procedural Posture

Criminal Robbery (penal Code) / Sentencing (appeal Grounds)

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Appropriate quantum of sentence for robbery with weapon in a public place
  2. 2 Whether the sentence should run concurrently with or commence after existing sentences
  3. 3 Weight to be given to guilty plea and personal mitigation (drug addiction, remorse)

Ratio Decidendi

Balancing public interest against accused's mitigation, the court found the offence (robbery with a knife in a public pharmacy) sufficiently serious to require a deterrent sentence; the one transaction rule did not apply because offences occurred on separate occasions, therefore the sentence of 3 years imprisonment and one stroke of whipping was imposed to commence upon conclusion of the accused's existing sentence for case no. BA-62RS-28-05/2025.

Court Disposition

Accused convicted on guilty plea and sentenced to 3 years imprisonment and whipping (1 stroke), sentence to commence upon conclusion of sentence for case no. BA-62RS-28-05/2025.

Orders

  • Sentence: 3 years imprisonment.
  • Corporal punishment: 1 stroke of whipping.