[ ] MUHAMAD FIRDAUS BIN RAZALI

[ ] MUHAMAD FIRDAUS BIN RAZALI

After considering the admitted facts, plea of guilty, first offender status, family responsibilities and public interest, the five-year imprisonment term (from arrest date) running concurrently with DA-62RS-20-08/2025 is appropriate and sufficient; however the omission to impose a fine or caning was identified and should be corrected by the higher court.

Citation
DA-62RS-24-08/2025 (Mahkamah Sesyen)
Parties
Perayu: Pendakwa Raya; Responden: Muhamad Firdaus bin Razali
Court
Sessions Court
Jurisdiction
Malaysia
Judgment Date
28 January 2026
Case Number
DA-62RS-24-08/2025 (Mahkamah Sesyen)
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal From Sessions Court / Judgment on Appeal/sentencing
Outcome
Sessions Court sentence of five years' imprisonment (from 14/07/2025) to run concurrently with DA-62RS-20-08/2025 upheld as appropriate; omission to impose fine or caning noted and referred for correction.
Legal Topics
Robbery (snatch/robbery), Section 392 Kanun Keseksaan, Mitigating Factors, Concurrent Sentences, Sentence Correction (fine or Caning)
Source Language
Malay/English
Criminal Law Sentencing Robbery (snatch/robbery) Section 392 Kanun Keseksaan Mitigating Factors Concurrent Sentences Sentence Correction (fine or Caning)

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 9 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 6
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Pendakwa Raya

Perayu

Muhamad Firdaus bin Razali

Responden

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal From Sessions Court / Judgment on Appeal/sentencing

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Appropriateness of five-year sentence under Section 392
  2. 2 Whether mitigation (plea of guilty, first offender, family responsibilities) warrants reduction
  3. 3 Whether fine or caning should have been imposed in addition to imprisonment

Ratio Decidendi

After considering the admitted facts, plea of guilty, first offender status, family responsibilities and public interest, the five-year imprisonment term (from arrest date) running concurrently with DA-62RS-20-08/2025 is appropriate and sufficient; however the omission to impose a fine or caning was identified and should be corrected by the higher court.

Court Disposition

Sessions Court sentence of five years' imprisonment (from 14/07/2025) to run concurrently with DA-62RS-20-08/2025 upheld as appropriate; omission to impose fine or caning noted and referred for correction.

Orders

  • Respondent sentenced to imprisonment for 5 years from date of arrest 14/07/2025 to run concurrently with DA-62RS-20-08/2025
  • Sessions Court requests that the High Court correct the sentence to impose a fine or caning in addition to the imprisonment