ZAINI BIN JAMALUDIN KOLEJ UNIVERSITI ISLAM ANTARABANGSA SELANGOR (KUIAS)
The High Court allowed the appeal, set aside the Sessions Court judgment and remitted the case for retrial because the trial judge erred in law and principle by deciding the dispute solely on contractual clauses without properly considering employer conduct that may have caused the breach (constructive dismissal/unfair discrimination), by entertaining unpleaded allegations contrary to natural justice, by failing to require proper proof of special damages and by not addressing whether the double-penalty was recoverable absent an express election under clause 11.2; these errors necessitated a fresh trial before a different judge to assess viva voce evidence and credibility on those material...
- Citation
- BA-12BNCvC-24-02/2020 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Parties
- Appellant / Defendant: Zaini bin Jamaludin; Respondent / Plaintiff: International Islamic University College Selangor
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 23 September 2020
- Case Number
- BA-12BNCvC-24-02/2020 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal From Sessions Court (contract/employment Dispute) / High Court Appellate Decision Remitting Matter for Retrial Before Different Sessions Court Judge
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; Sessions Court judgment dated 6.2.2020 set aside; matter remitted for retrial before a different Sessions Court Judge; costs here and below to be borne by the parties respectively
- Legal Topics
- Scholarship Bond Breach, Constructive Dismissal, Unfair Discrimination, Freedom of Expression (art 10), Equality Before the Law (art 8), Proof of Special Damages, Natural Justice, Forum for Employment Disputes (industrial Court)
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Zaini bin Jamaludin
Appellant / Defendant
International Islamic University College Selangor
Respondent / Plaintiff
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal From Sessions Court (contract/employment Dispute) / High Court Appellate Decision Remitting Matter for Retrial Before Different Sessions Court Judge
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether appellant breached the scholarship agreement by resigning during bond period
- 2 Whether employer's disciplinary actions and transfer amounted to constructive dismissal or unfair discrimination
- 3 Whether employer can recover double the costs under clause 11.2 absent an express election to terminate
Ratio Decidendi
The High Court allowed the appeal, set aside the Sessions Court judgment and remitted the case for retrial because the trial judge erred in law and principle by deciding the dispute solely on contractual clauses without properly considering employer conduct that may have caused the breach (constructive dismissal/unfair discrimination), by entertaining unpleaded allegations contrary to natural justice, by failing to require proper proof of special damages and by not addressing whether the double-penalty was recoverable absent an express election under clause 11.2; these errors necessitated a fresh trial before a different judge to assess viva voce evidence and credibility on those material...
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; Sessions Court judgment dated 6.2.2020 set aside; matter remitted for retrial before a different Sessions Court Judge; costs here and below to be borne by the parties respectively
Orders
- Set aside Sessions Court judgment dated 6 February 2020
- Allow appeal of appellant and remit case to Sessions Court for re-trial before a different Sessions Court Judge
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment