BL-42JSKH-8-02/2022 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
The Sessions Court correctly applied established sentencing principles, balancing offender's youth and guilty plea against the seriousness of multiple sexual assaults on a 15‑year‑old; the resulting sentence of five years' imprisonment, one stroke of the cane, counselling during imprisonment and two years' police supervision was not erroneous in principle and is upheld; both the prosecution's appeal and the accused's cross‑appeal are dismissed.
- Citation
- BL-42JSKH-8-02/2022 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Parties
- Perayu: Pendakwa Raya; Respondent (cross Appellant): Ashley Roland Robern
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 21 July 2022
- Case Number
- BL-42JSKH-8-02/2022 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / High Court Judgment on Appeals
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; cross-appeal dismissed; Sessions Court sentence upheld.
- Legal Topics
- Section 377 C Penal Code, Sexual Offences Against Children Act 2017, Sentencing Principles, Protection of Minors, Appellate Review of Sentence
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Pendakwa Raya
Perayu
Ashley Roland Robern
Respondent (cross Appellant)
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / High Court Judgment on Appeals
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentence imposed by the Sessions Court for offence under s377C Kanun Keseksaan was unduly lenient or excessive
- 2 Proper application of sentencing principles including proportionality, public interest and antecedents
- 3 Appropriate ancillary orders under the Sexual Offences Against Children Act 2017 (counselling and police supervision)
Ratio Decidendi
The Sessions Court correctly applied established sentencing principles, balancing offender's youth and guilty plea against the seriousness of multiple sexual assaults on a 15‑year‑old; the resulting sentence of five years' imprisonment, one stroke of the cane, counselling during imprisonment and two years' police supervision was not erroneous in principle and is upheld; both the prosecution's appeal and the accused's cross‑appeal are dismissed.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; cross-appeal dismissed; Sessions Court sentence upheld.
Orders
- Both appeals dismissed
- Sentence of five years' imprisonment and one stroke of the cane upheld
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment