PEMIUTANG PENGHAKIMAN 1. AMINUL ISLAM ABDUL NOR (NRIC NO.: 670508-79-5039) 2. JR JOINT RESOURCES HOLDINGS SDN BHD (COMPANY NO.: 462917-T) PENGHUTANG PENGHAKIMAN JALALUDIN BIN SULAIMAN (NRIC NO.: 680728-01-5515)
Service of the execution cause papers by registered post was valid and presumed effective under s12 Interpretation Acts and Order 62 r6 ROC; the judgment debtor failed to rebut that presumption; the challenged Rules of Court provisions (Order 45/47) were inapplicable as they concern committal; the Amended Judgment was clear and enforceable and the JD is estopped from collateral attack after exhausting appeals. Accordingly the application to set aside the execution proceedings was dismissed with costs.
- Citation
- JA-36-17-07/2019 [enclosure 23] (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Parties
- Judgment Creditor: AMINUL ISLAM ABDUL NOR; Judgment Creditor: JR JOINT RESOURCES HOLDINGS SDN BHD; Judgment Debtor: JALALUDIN BIN SULAIMAN
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 8 July 2021
- Case Number
- JA-36-17-07/2019 [enclosure 23] (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Procedural Posture
- Enforcement of High Court Judgment (execution) / Application to Set Aside Execution Proceedings (prohibitory Order and Order for Sale)
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Service of Process, Prohibitory Order, Order for Sale, Joint and Several Liability, Interpretation Act S12, Collateral Challenge/estoppel
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
AMINUL ISLAM ABDUL NOR
Judgment Creditor
JR JOINT RESOURCES HOLDINGS SDN BHD
Judgment Creditor
JALALUDIN BIN SULAIMAN
Judgment Debtor
Procedural Posture
Enforcement of High Court Judgment (execution) / Application to Set Aside Execution Proceedings (prohibitory Order and Order for Sale)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether cause papers for execution proceedings were validly served on the judgment debtor
- 2 Whether service by registered post satisfies Rules of Court for execution documents
- 3 Whether Order 45/47 provisions relied on by JD apply to execution by sale (non‑committal)
Ratio Decidendi
Service of the execution cause papers by registered post was valid and presumed effective under s12 Interpretation Acts and Order 62 r6 ROC; the judgment debtor failed to rebut that presumption; the challenged Rules of Court provisions (Order 45/47) were inapplicable as they concern committal; the Amended Judgment was clear and enforceable and the JD is estopped from collateral attack after exhausting appeals. Accordingly the application to set aside the execution proceedings was dismissed with costs.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- Application in Enclosure 23 to set aside execution proceedings dismissed
- Applications JA-36-20-07/2019 and JA-36-21-07/2019 dismissed (identical grounds)
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment