MOHAMED YAACOB BIN HUSAIN 1. ) LAKSHMANAN A/L SUBRAMONIAN 2. ) PENGHUNI-PENGHUNI DI ATAS HARTANAH YANG TERKANDUNG DI DALAM GRN 20686, LOT 10307, MUKIM KLANG, DAERAH KLANG, SELANGOR DARUL EHSAN

MOHAMED YAACOB BIN HUSAIN 1. ) LAKSHMANAN A/L SUBRAMONIAN 2. ) PENGHUNI-PENGHUNI DI ATAS HARTANAH YANG TERKANDUNG DI DALAM GRN 20686, LOT 10307, MUKIM KLANG, DAERAH KLANG, SELANGOR DARUL EHSAN

Service was held valid because documents were delivered at the property's address and acknowledged in the presence of D1; the application to set aside was filed out of time (beyond 30 days) without satisfactory explanation; defendants failed to demonstrate a meritorious defence with documentary evidence (bare denial); execution routed via MTSA was procedurally acceptable given enforcement capacity. Therefore the application to set aside the order dated 30.5.2022 is dismissed with costs.

Citation
BL-24NCvC-20-04/2022 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
Parties
Plaintiff (pentadbir/waris Kadim Bagi Harta Pesaka Husain Bin Mohamed): MOHAMED YAACOB BIN HUSAIN; Defendant 1: LAKSHMANAN A/L SUBRAMONIAN; Defendant 2 (occupant): PENGHUNI DI ATAS HARTANAH YANG TERKANDUNG DIDALAM GRN 20686, LOT 10307, MUKIM KLANG, DAERAH KLANG, SELANGOR DARUL EHSAN
Court
High Court
Jurisdiction
Malaysia
Judgment Date
4 January 2023
Case Number
BL-24NCvC-20-04/2022 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
Procedural Posture
Saman Pemula (possession/land) / Application to Set Aside Default Judgment (post Judgment)
Outcome
Defendants' application to set aside the order dated 30.5.2022 dismissed
Legal Topics
Service of Process, Setting Aside Judgment, Possession, Execution of Judgment, Jurisdiction
Source Language
Malay/English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

MOHAMED YAACOB BIN HUSAIN

Plaintiff (pentadbir/waris Kadim Bagi Harta Pesaka Husain Bin Mohamed)

LAKSHMANAN A/L SUBRAMONIAN

Defendant 1

PENGHUNI DI ATAS HARTANAH YANG TERKANDUNG DIDALAM GRN 20686, LOT 10307, MUKIM KLANG, DAERAH KLANG, SELANGOR DARUL EHSAN

Defendant 2 (occupant)

Procedural Posture

Saman Pemula (possession/land) / Application to Set Aside Default Judgment (post Judgment)

  1. 1 Validity of service of originating process
  2. 2 Whether defendants applied in time to set aside judgment
  3. 3 Whether defendants have a meritorious defence (licence/lease)

Ratio Decidendi

Service was held valid because documents were delivered at the property's address and acknowledged in the presence of D1; the application to set aside was filed out of time (beyond 30 days) without satisfactory explanation; defendants failed to demonstrate a meritorious defence with documentary evidence (bare denial); execution routed via MTSA was procedurally acceptable given enforcement capacity. Therefore the application to set aside the order dated 30.5.2022 is dismissed with costs.

Court Disposition

Defendants' application to set aside the order dated 30.5.2022 dismissed

Orders

  • Application by defendants to set aside order dated 30.5.2022 dismissed
  • Costs awarded to plaintiff in the sum of RM5000