PEMIUTANG PENGHAKIMAN RHB INVESTMENT BANK BERHAD PENGHUTANG PENGHAKIMAN AHMAD AKMAL BIN HAMZAH
The Consent Order constituted a final judgment supporting issuance of the Bankruptcy Notice; the Settlement Agreement and Supplemental SA preserved the creditor's rights and did not discharge or vary the guarantors where the guarantee expressly contracted out of ss.87,88,92 and 94 CA; the BN and certificate of indebtedness sufficiently particularised the debt and interest; exhaustion of execution under s.5(4) IA is required only against the principal debtor (who had no further remedies), and accordingly the creditor was entitled to leave under s.5(3)(b) and the appeals were allowed.
- Citation
- WA-29NCC-1070-06/2024 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Parties
- Judgment Debtor: LIM KIAN BOON; Judgment Debtor: AHMAD AKMAL BIN HAMZAH; Judgment Creditor: RHB INVESTMENT BANK BERHAD; Borrower: Arus Dermaga Sdn Bhd; Corporate Guarantor: One Petrol One Resources Berhad
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 13 January 2026
- Case Number
- WA-29NCC-1070-06/2024 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Procedural Posture
- Bankruptcy/insolvency Appeal (high Court, Commercial Division) / Appeal From Senior Assistant Registrar Decision; Judgment on Consolidated Appeals
- Outcome
- Appeals allowed in favour of the judgment creditor; orders made restoring the creditor's position and permitting bankruptcy steps to proceed against the guarantors; similar orders made in parallel proceedings.
- Legal Topics
- Setting Aside Bankruptcy Notice, Leave to Commence Bankruptcy Under S.5(3)(b) IA, Guarantor Liability and Effect of Settlement Agreements, Finality of Consent Orders, Exhaustion of Execution (s.5(4) Ia), Application of Ss.87, 88, 92, 94 Contracts Act, Post Judgment Interest and Limitation
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
LIM KIAN BOON
Judgment Debtor
AHMAD AKMAL BIN HAMZAH
Judgment Debtor
RHB INVESTMENT BANK BERHAD
Judgment Creditor
Arus Dermaga Sdn Bhd
Borrower
One Petrol One Resources Berhad
Corporate Guarantor
Procedural Posture
Bankruptcy/insolvency Appeal (high Court, Commercial Division) / Appeal From Senior Assistant Registrar Decision; Judgment on Consolidated Appeals
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Consent Order is a final judgment under s.3(1)(i) IA
- 2 Whether the Bankruptcy Notice (BN) was defective or ambiguous
- 3 Whether the Settlement Agreement/Supplemental SA varied or discharged guarantors' liabilities
Ratio Decidendi
The Consent Order constituted a final judgment supporting issuance of the Bankruptcy Notice; the Settlement Agreement and Supplemental SA preserved the creditor's rights and did not discharge or vary the guarantors where the guarantee expressly contracted out of ss.87,88,92 and 94 CA; the BN and certificate of indebtedness sufficiently particularised the debt and interest; exhaustion of execution under s.5(4) IA is required only against the principal debtor (who had no further remedies), and accordingly the creditor was entitled to leave under s.5(3)(b) and the appeals were allowed.
Court Disposition
Appeals allowed in favour of the judgment creditor; orders made restoring the creditor's position and permitting bankruptcy steps to proceed against the guarantors; similar orders made in parallel proceedings.
Orders
- Allow Encl 37 (appeal concerning setting aside the Bankruptcy Notice) in Bankruptcy 1069 and overturn the SAR's decision
- Allow Encl 38 (appeal concerning leave to commence bankruptcy under s.5(3)(b)) in Bankruptcy 1069 and grant leave to proceed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment