RAGAWANG CORPORATION SDN BHD ONE AMERIN RESIDENCE SDN BHD
The High Court found the 2nd arbitrator made material errors and contradictions by deciding termination based on an incomplete documentary record and incorrect factual assumptions (including that certain issues had been decided in the 1st arbitration and that set-off had disposed of the subject matter), and by denying Ragawang a meaningful opportunity to be heard; those breaches of natural justice had a real and substantial impact on the outcome and thereby rendered the awards in conflict with the public policy of Malaysia under s37 of the Arbitration Act 2005, warranting setting aside of the Final Awards terminating the 2nd and 3rd Notices of Arbitration.
- Citation
- BA-24C(ARB)-9-11/2022 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Parties
- Applicant/plaintiff: Ragawang Corporation Sdn Bhd; Respondent/defendant: One Amerin Residence Sdn Bhd
- Court
- ARB
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 20 November 2023
- Case Number
- BA-24C(ARB)-9-11/2022 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Procedural Posture
- Arbitration Setting Aside Award (originating Summons) / High Court Judgment on Originating Summons
- Outcome
- Originating summons allowed in part; Final Awards terminating the 2nd and 3rd Notices of Arbitration set aside for breach of natural justice and conflict with public policy
- Legal Topics
- Setting Aside Arbitral Award, Jurisdiction Objection, Natural Justice, Public Policy, PAM Contract Provisions, Final Account Disputes, Retention Sum and Set Off
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ragawang Corporation Sdn Bhd
Applicant/plaintiff
One Amerin Residence Sdn Bhd
Respondent/defendant
Procedural Posture
Arbitration Setting Aside Award (originating Summons) / High Court Judgment on Originating Summons
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the 2nd arbitrator made errors and contradictions in terminating the 2nd and 3rd Notices of Arbitration
- 2 Whether the 2nd arbitrator breached rules of natural justice (right to be heard and impartiality)
- 3 Whether the awards terminating the arbitrations are in conflict with public policy under s37 of the Arbitration Act 2005
Ratio Decidendi
The High Court found the 2nd arbitrator made material errors and contradictions by deciding termination based on an incomplete documentary record and incorrect factual assumptions (including that certain issues had been decided in the 1st arbitration and that set-off had disposed of the subject matter), and by denying Ragawang a meaningful opportunity to be heard; those breaches of natural justice had a real and substantial impact on the outcome and thereby rendered the awards in conflict with the public policy of Malaysia under s37 of the Arbitration Act 2005, warranting setting aside of the Final Awards terminating the 2nd and 3rd Notices of Arbitration.
Court Disposition
Originating summons allowed in part; Final Awards terminating the 2nd and 3rd Notices of Arbitration set aside for breach of natural justice and conflict with public policy
Orders
- Set aside the Final Awards terminating the 2nd and 3rd Notices of Arbitration
- Remit the jurisdictional objections for rehearing or further determination consistent with this judgment
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment