1. ) SJIC BINA SDN BHD 2. ) ISKANDAR REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY 1. ) ISKANDAR REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY 2. ) SJIC BINA SDN BHD
IRDA failed to prove on the balance of probabilities that the arbitral tribunal committed breaches of the rules of natural justice or that the Award conflicted with Malaysia’s public policy; the Award contained sufficient reasons and demonstrably considered IRDA’s arguments (interpretation of 'savings', quantum, MNIC); the court will not re‑weigh factual findings and credibility determinations made by the tribunal; accordingly the applications to set aside the Award and to set aside enforcement were dismissed.
- Citation
- WA-24C(ARB)-35-08/2019 & WA-24C(ARB)-49-11/2019 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Parties
- Applicant in OS WA 24 C(arb) 35 08/2019; Respondent in OS WA 24 C(arb) 49 11/2019: SJIC Bina Sdn Bhd (Company No.: 809930-U); Applicant in OS WA 24 C(arb) 49 11/2019; Respondent in OS WA 24 C(arb) 35 08/2019: Iskandar Regional Development Authority (IRDA)
- Court
- ARB
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 4 June 2020
- Case Number
- WA-24C(ARB)-35-08/2019 & WA-24C(ARB)-49-11/2019 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Procedural Posture
- Applications to Set Aside and to Resist Enforcement of an Arbitral Award (originating Summons) / Judgment on Applications to Set Aside Arbitral Award and to Set Aside Enforcement Order (grounds of Judgment)
- Outcome
- All applications by IRDA to set aside the arbitral Award and to set aside enforcement order dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Setting Aside Arbitral Award Under Arbitration Act 2005 S 37, Public Policy as Ground to Set Aside Award, Breach of Rules of Natural Justice/audi Alteram Partem, Interpretation of Contractual Variation/design Change, Proof of Quantum and Expert Evidence, Estoppel, Enforcement of Arbitral Award
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
SJIC Bina Sdn Bhd (Company No.: 809930-U)
Applicant in OS WA 24 C(arb) 35 08/2019; Respondent in OS WA 24 C(arb) 49 11/2019
Iskandar Regional Development Authority (IRDA)
Applicant in OS WA 24 C(arb) 49 11/2019; Respondent in OS WA 24 C(arb) 35 08/2019
Procedural Posture
Applications to Set Aside and to Resist Enforcement of an Arbitral Award (originating Summons) / Judgment on Applications to Set Aside Arbitral Award and to Set Aside Enforcement Order (grounds of Judgment)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the arbitral award should be set aside for breach of natural justice in connection with making the award
- 2 Whether the arbitral award is in conflict with the public policy of Malaysia
- 3 Whether the tribunal failed to consider IRDA’s key submissions on interpretation of 'any saving to the Contract', proof of quantum and scope of MNIC such that the award is vitiated
Ratio Decidendi
IRDA failed to prove on the balance of probabilities that the arbitral tribunal committed breaches of the rules of natural justice or that the Award conflicted with Malaysia’s public policy; the Award contained sufficient reasons and demonstrably considered IRDA’s arguments (interpretation of 'savings', quantum, MNIC); the court will not re‑weigh factual findings and credibility determinations made by the tribunal; accordingly the applications to set aside the Award and to set aside enforcement were dismissed.
Court Disposition
All applications by IRDA to set aside the arbitral Award and to set aside enforcement order dismissed
Orders
- IRDA’s applications dismissed
- IRDA to pay costs to SJIC Bina in the agreed sums: RM20,000.00 for each enclosure (two enclosures)
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment