TMF TRUST LABUAN LIMITED ROBINSON PLANNER COMPANY LIMITED
The court found the identity of authorised persons was not a pleaded issue submitted for determination, the arbitral tribunal had considered the parties' arguments and properly based its finding of breach on the undisputed fact that the impugned instructions emanated from third‑party fraudsters; there was no material breach of natural justice nor conflict with Malaysian public policy, so the setting aside application was dismissed and the Partial Award was recognised and enforced.
- Citation
- WA-24NCC(ARB)-1-01/2024 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Parties
- Applicant in Os1; Respondent in OS41: TMF Trust Labuan Limited; Respondent in Os1; Applicant in OS41: Robinson Planner Company Limited
- Court
- ARB
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 10 June 2024
- Case Number
- WA-24NCC(ARB)-1-01/2024 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Procedural Posture
- Originating Summons (setting Aside and Enforcement of Arbitral Award) / Judgment (decision on Applications to Set Aside and to Enforce a Partial Arbitral Award)
- Outcome
- TMF's application to set aside the Partial Award dismissed; RPL's application to recognise and enforce the Partial Award allowed
- Legal Topics
- Setting Aside Arbitral Award Under Arbitration Act 2005 S37, Recognition and Enforcement Under Arbitration Act 2005 S38, Breach of Natural Justice/audi Alteram Partem, Interpretation of Custodian Agreement Provisions on Proper Instructions, Fraud and Impersonation in Cross Border Payments
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
TMF Trust Labuan Limited
Applicant in Os1; Respondent in OS41
Robinson Planner Company Limited
Respondent in Os1; Applicant in OS41
Procedural Posture
Originating Summons (setting Aside and Enforcement of Arbitral Award) / Judgment (decision on Applications to Set Aside and to Enforce a Partial Arbitral Award)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the arbitral tribunal breached natural justice by failing to determine identity of authorised persons
- 2 Whether failure to determine identity of authorised persons renders award in conflict with Malaysian public policy under s37 AA 2005
- 3 Whether the identity of authorised persons was a pleaded issue before the tribunal
Ratio Decidendi
The court found the identity of authorised persons was not a pleaded issue submitted for determination, the arbitral tribunal had considered the parties' arguments and properly based its finding of breach on the undisputed fact that the impugned instructions emanated from third‑party fraudsters; there was no material breach of natural justice nor conflict with Malaysian public policy, so the setting aside application was dismissed and the Partial Award was recognised and enforced.
Court Disposition
TMF's application to set aside the Partial Award dismissed; RPL's application to recognise and enforce the Partial Award allowed
Orders
- Partial Award dated 14.8.2023 (save as to costs) recognised as binding and enforced as a judgment of the High Court pursuant to s38 AA 2005
- Costs of RM20,000.00 to be paid jointly by TMF to RPL for both OS 1 and OS 41, subject to allocatur fees
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment