MUHAMMAD YUSOF BIN MOHAMAD ABDUL RAHMAN
Because the offence involved a child victim who was the accused's stepdaughter (a breach of trust), the accused was a repeat sexual offender, and public interest demanded deterrence and denunciation, the court imposed an immediate custodial sentence of eight years, an additional two years to run consecutively under s16, two strokes, compulsory counselling under s26 and one year police supervision under s27; the sentence was ordered to commence from the date of conviction and not backdated.
- Citation
- AC-62JSK-27-10/2025 (Mahkamah Sesyen)
- Parties
- Prosecution: Public Prosecutor (PP); Accused: Muhammad Yusof bin Mohamad Abdul Rahman
- Court
- Sessions Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 15 January 2026
- Case Number
- AC-62JSK-27-10/2025 (Mahkamah Sesyen)
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Sexual Offences Against Children / Sentencing
- Outcome
- Convicted following guilty plea and sentenced.
- Legal Topics
- Sexual Assault of Minor, Breach of Trust, Repeat Sexual Offender, Plea of Guilt Mitigation, Corporal Punishment (sebat), Counselling and Supervision Orders
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Public Prosecutor (PP)
Prosecution
Muhammad Yusof bin Mohamad Abdul Rahman
Accused
Procedural Posture
Criminal Sexual Offences Against Children / Sentencing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether sentence appropriate for offence under s14(b) of the Child Sexual Offences Against Children Act 2017
- 2 Aggravating factors: relationship of trust as stepfather and prior sexual offending
- 3 Extent to which guilty plea mitigates sentence
Ratio Decidendi
Because the offence involved a child victim who was the accused's stepdaughter (a breach of trust), the accused was a repeat sexual offender, and public interest demanded deterrence and denunciation, the court imposed an immediate custodial sentence of eight years, an additional two years to run consecutively under s16, two strokes, compulsory counselling under s26 and one year police supervision under s27; the sentence was ordered to commence from the date of conviction and not backdated.
Court Disposition
Convicted following guilty plea and sentenced.
Orders
- Imprisonment for eight (8) years to commence from date of conviction
- Additional imprisonment for two (2) years under section 16 to run consecutively
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment