TAN NYOK CHIN PEMUNGUT DUTI SETEM
The court held the Collector correctly adjudicated ad valorem duty: the Deed of Settlement/renunciation and the subsequent Form 14A operated such that the beneficiaries' renunciation to the Plaintiff constituted a voluntary inter vivos disposition (gift) of beneficial interests; Form 14A effects the legal transfer of title and is the instrument chargeable under Item 66(c) read with Item 32(a) and s16(1), therefore ad valorem duty of RM20,800 was properly imposed.
- Citation
- BA-24NCvC-1560-08/2023 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Parties
- Plaintiff / Administratrix & Beneficiary: Tan Nyok Chin; Defendant / Revenue Authority: Pemungut Duti Setem (Collector of Stamp Duties), Lembaga Hasil Dalam Negeri
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 31 January 2024
- Case Number
- BA-24NCvC-1560-08/2023 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Procedural Posture
- Originating Summons Under S39 Stamp Act 1949 (appeal Against Stamp Assessment) / Judgment (high Court, Shah Alam)
- Outcome
- Originating Summons dismissed; Plaintiff's objection to ad valorem assessment dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Stamp Act 1949 First Schedule (items 32, 46, 66), Form 14 a (memorandum of Transfer), Vesting Order, Renunciation of Inheritance, Ad Valorem Vs Fixed Stamp Duty, Voluntary Disposition Inter Vivos
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Tan Nyok Chin
Plaintiff / Administratrix & Beneficiary
Pemungut Duti Setem (Collector of Stamp Duties), Lembaga Hasil Dalam Negeri
Defendant / Revenue Authority
Procedural Posture
Originating Summons Under S39 Stamp Act 1949 (appeal Against Stamp Assessment) / Judgment (high Court, Shah Alam)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Form 14A effecting beneficiaries' renunciation to a single beneficiary is chargeable as a gift (ad valorem under Item 66(c) read with Item 32(a)) or as a fixed duty under Item 32(i)
- 2 Whether renunciation by beneficiaries constitutes a voluntary inter vivos disposition attracting ad valorem duty under s16(1)
Ratio Decidendi
The court held the Collector correctly adjudicated ad valorem duty: the Deed of Settlement/renunciation and the subsequent Form 14A operated such that the beneficiaries' renunciation to the Plaintiff constituted a voluntary inter vivos disposition (gift) of beneficial interests; Form 14A effects the legal transfer of title and is the instrument chargeable under Item 66(c) read with Item 32(a) and s16(1), therefore ad valorem duty of RM20,800 was properly imposed.
Court Disposition
Originating Summons dismissed; Plaintiff's objection to ad valorem assessment dismissed
Orders
- Plaintiff's originating summons dismissed with costs to Defendant
- Assessment of ad valorem stamp duty of RM20,800 upheld and not refundable
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment