PENAMA XXXX

PENAMA XXXX

Having weighed public interest and need for deterrence against the welfare, age (16), first‑offender status, full probation report, early guilty plea, lack of evidence of violence, remorse and strong family supervision, the court exercised its discretion under s.91(1)(b) Child Act 2001 to avoid custodial/Henry Gurney disposition and instead ordered release on a 3‑year good behaviour bond with RM1,000 surety and a 1‑year parental bond with specified supervisory and counselling conditions.

Citation
JC-84-49-12/2024 (Mahkamah Majistret)
Parties
Prosecution: Pendakwa Raya; Child Defendant: MFBF (Kanak-kanak)
Court
Magistrates' Court
Jurisdiction
Malaysia
Judgment Date
22 January 2025
Case Number
JC-84-49-12/2024 (Mahkamah Majistret)
Procedural Posture
Criminal (sexual Offences Involving a Child) / Sentencing (post Plea)
Outcome
Accused found guilty on two counts under section 376(1) Penal Code; non‑custodial orders imposed.
Legal Topics
Statutory Rape, Sentencing Principles for Children, Probation Report and Rehabilitation, Good Behaviour Bond, Parental Supervision
Source Language
Malay/English
Criminal Law Child Law Sexual Offences Sentencing Law Statutory Rape Sentencing Principles for Children Probation Report and Rehabilitation Good Behaviour Bond +1 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 22 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Pendakwa Raya

Prosecution

MFBF (Kanak-kanak)

Child Defendant

Procedural Posture

Criminal (sexual Offences Involving a Child) / Sentencing (post Plea)

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether a custodial sentence or placement in Henry Gurney School is necessary or whether non-custodial orders under Child Act 2001 are appropriate
  2. 2 Proper weight to give to probation (welfare) report, guilty plea and mitigating factors
  3. 3 Balancing public interest/deterrence against the welfare and rehabilitation of a child offender

Ratio Decidendi

Having weighed public interest and need for deterrence against the welfare, age (16), first‑offender status, full probation report, early guilty plea, lack of evidence of violence, remorse and strong family supervision, the court exercised its discretion under s.91(1)(b) Child Act 2001 to avoid custodial/Henry Gurney disposition and instead ordered release on a 3‑year good behaviour bond with RM1,000 surety and a 1‑year parental bond with specified supervisory and counselling conditions.

Court Disposition

Accused found guilty on two counts under section 376(1) Penal Code; non‑custodial orders imposed.