LAIN-LAIN 1. ) 1. EASA BIN MOHD NOOR 2. JAMALUDDIN BIN HASSAN 3. RUKIAH BINTI MAHMOOD 4. YAHYA BIN ABDUL RAUF ... PENTADBIR-PENTADBIR 2. ) ZOLFAKAR BIN HAJI OSMAN MOHD TOWFIKE BIN OSMAN ... PENSITASI

LAIN-LAIN 1. ) 1. EASA BIN MOHD NOOR 2. JAMALUDDIN BIN HASSAN 3. RUKIAH BINTI MAHMOOD 4. YAHYA BIN ABDUL RAUF ... PENTADBIR-PENTADBIR 2. ) ZOLFAKAR BIN HAJI OSMAN MOHD TOWFIKE BIN OSMAN ... PENSITASI

The application to strike out the citation was refused because the dispute is a contested probate matter under Order 72 that raises substantial factual and legal issues unsuitable for summary disposal; procedural defects identified did not amount to irremediable breaches justifying striking out in view of the overriding objective and inherent powers, and consolidation with the pending related High Court action was appropriate to resolve the matters comprehensively.

Citation
18/1957 (LAMPIRAN 126) (Mahkamah Tinggi)
Parties
Administrator (applicant): Easa bin Mohd Noor; Administrator (applicant): Jamaluddin bin Hassan; Administrator (applicant): Rukiah binti Mahmood; Administrator (applicant): Yahya bin Abdul Rauf; Citor (respondent): Zolfakar bin Haji Osman; Citor (respondent): Mohd Towfike bin Osman
Court
LAMPIRAN 126
Jurisdiction
Malaysia
Judgment Date
6 July 2021
Case Number
18/1957 (LAMPIRAN 126) (Mahkamah Tinggi)
Procedural Posture
Probate and Administration / Interlocutory Application to Strike Out Citation; Consolidation and Case Management Order
Outcome
Application dismissed; citation not struck out; related writ action ordered consolidated with High Court Civil No. JB-22NCVC-65-10/2018; costs awarded in the action and case management directions given.
Legal Topics
Striking Out Under Order 18 R 19, Citation Procedure Under Order 72, Abuse of Process, Res Judicata/issue Estoppel, Consolidation of Actions, Administration of Estates, Non‑compliance With Procedural Rules
Source Language
Malay/English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 6 Authorities cited 22 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Easa bin Mohd Noor

Administrator (applicant)

Jamaluddin bin Hassan

Administrator (applicant)

Rukiah binti Mahmood

Administrator (applicant)

Yahya bin Abdul Rauf

Administrator (applicant)

Zolfakar bin Haji Osman

Citor (respondent)

Mohd Towfike bin Osman

Citor (respondent)

Procedural Posture

Probate and Administration / Interlocutory Application to Strike Out Citation; Consolidation and Case Management Order

  1. 1 Whether the citation (Lampiran 115) should be struck out for being humiliating, oppressive or causing delay or abuse of process under Order 18 r 19
  2. 2 Whether the citation fails for non‑compliance with Form 167 and Rule/Order 71/72 requirements and statutory/procedural time limits
  3. 3 Whether the citation constitutes duplicative proceedings suitable for determination in another pending High Court action and whether consolidation is appropriate

Ratio Decidendi

The application to strike out the citation was refused because the dispute is a contested probate matter under Order 72 that raises substantial factual and legal issues unsuitable for summary disposal; procedural defects identified did not amount to irremediable breaches justifying striking out in view of the overriding objective and inherent powers, and consolidation with the pending related High Court action was appropriate to resolve the matters comprehensively.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed; citation not struck out; related writ action ordered consolidated with High Court Civil No. JB-22NCVC-65-10/2018; costs awarded in the action and case management directions given.

Orders

  • Lampiran 126 & 134 dismissed
  • Writ Saman disatukan dengan Mahkamah Tinggi Muar Guaman No. JB-22NCVC-65-10/2018