RINTIS MALAY MOTORS SDN. BHD. (Company No: 120864-P) AGASTA CO. LTD. (Company Registration No. In Japan: 0110-01-072500)
Rintis failed to discharge the burden to prove coercion/duress; the Reconditioned Vehicles were delivered and unpaid so Rintis breached the contracts; NEXI validly acquired enforceable rights by subrogation/assignment under Japanese law and by a written assignment with notice satisfying s4(3) Civil Law Act 1956, therefore NEXI and Agasta have locus standi and are entitled to the claimed sums with interest and costs; Rintis' counterclaim and Suit 412 dismissed.
- Citation
- WA-22NCC-412-09/2018 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Parties
- Plaintiff (suit 132); Defendant (suit 412): Agasta Co. Ltd.; Plaintiff (suit 132): Nippon Export and Investment Insurance (NEXI); Defendant (suit 132); Plaintiff (suit 412): Rintis Malay Motors Sdn. Bhd.
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 27 August 2021
- Case Number
- WA-22NCC-412-09/2018 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial Division Civil Suits (contract and Insurance) / Judgment After Full Trial (consolidated Hearing of Two Suits)
- Outcome
- Judgment for Plaintiffs Agasta Co. Ltd. and Nippon Export and Investment Insurance; Defendant Rintis Malay Motors liable for sums awarded; Defendant's counterclaim dismissed; Suit 412 dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Subrogation, Assignment of Chose in Action, Duress and Coercion, Locus Standi of Insurer, Choice of Law
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Agasta Co. Ltd.
Plaintiff (suit 132); Defendant (suit 412)
Nippon Export and Investment Insurance (NEXI)
Plaintiff (suit 132)
Rintis Malay Motors Sdn. Bhd.
Defendant (suit 132); Plaintiff (suit 412)
Procedural Posture
Commercial Division Civil Suits (contract and Insurance) / Judgment After Full Trial (consolidated Hearing of Two Suits)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Sales Contracts and rescheduling Agreement were entered under coercion/duress and voidable
- 2 Whether Rintis breached the Sales Contracts and Agreement by failing to pay for delivered goods
- 3 Whether NEXI, a non-party to the Agreement, has locus standi to sue in its own name
Ratio Decidendi
Rintis failed to discharge the burden to prove coercion/duress; the Reconditioned Vehicles were delivered and unpaid so Rintis breached the contracts; NEXI validly acquired enforceable rights by subrogation/assignment under Japanese law and by a written assignment with notice satisfying s4(3) Civil Law Act 1956, therefore NEXI and Agasta have locus standi and are entitled to the claimed sums with interest and costs; Rintis' counterclaim and Suit 412 dismissed.
Court Disposition
Judgment for Plaintiffs Agasta Co. Ltd. and Nippon Export and Investment Insurance; Defendant Rintis Malay Motors liable for sums awarded; Defendant's counterclaim dismissed; Suit 412 dismissed.
Orders
- Defendant Rintis Malay Motors Sdn Bhd to pay Agasta Co. Ltd JPY 9,974,688 or its equivalent in Ringgit Malaysia with interest at 5% per annum from date of Writ until full settlement
- Defendant Rintis Malay Motors Sdn Bhd to pay Nippon Export and Investment Insurance JPY 189,519,072 or its equivalent in Ringgit Malaysia with interest at 5% per annum from date of Writ until full settlement
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment