1. ALINA BINTI KUSNAN (berniaga sebagai ASPIRASI DIGITAL ENTERPRISE) (NO PENDAFTARAN PERNIAGAAN - JM0351228-V) [ NRIC No.: 730902015688 ] 2. ABDUL FARIT BIN ABDUL RAZAK (berniaga sebagai ASPIRASI DIGITAL ENTERPRISE) (NO PENDAFTARAN PERNIAGA

1. ALINA BINTI KUSNAN (berniaga sebagai ASPIRASI DIGITAL ENTERPRISE) (NO PENDAFTARAN PERNIAGAAN - JM0351228-V) [ NRIC No.: 730902015688 ] 2. ABDUL FARIT BIN ABDUL RAZAK (berniaga sebagai ASPIRASI DIGITAL ENTERPRISE) (NO PENDAFTARAN PERNIAGA

The High Court allowed the appeal and set aside the Sessions Court's summary judgment because the appellants raised at least one credible triable issue (document authenticity, payment patterns, price disparity and guarantor status) which cannot be resolved on affidavit evidence alone; matter remitted for full trial.

Citation
JA-12NCVC-129-09/2019 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
Parties
Appellant/defendant: ALINA BINTI KUSNAN; Appellant/defendant: ABDUL FARIT BIN ABDUL RAZAK; Appellant/defendant: ROSNIE TIEDDE; Appellant/defendant: NURHADI A HAMID; Respondent/plaintiff: FUJI XEROX ASIA PACIFIC PTE LTD
Court
High Court
Jurisdiction
Malaysia
Judgment Date
2 July 2020
Case Number
JA-12NCVC-129-09/2019 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal (summary Judgment) / Judgment on Appeal Remitted to Trial
Outcome
Appeal allowed
Legal Topics
Summary Judgment, Order 14 Rules of Court 2012, Rental Agreement, Continuing Guarantee and Indemnity, Triable Issues
Source Language
Malay/English
Contract Civil Procedure Commercial Law Guarantee Law Summary Judgment Order 14 Rules of Court 2012 Rental Agreement Continuing Guarantee and Indemnity +1 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 8 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

ALINA BINTI KUSNAN

Appellant/defendant

ABDUL FARIT BIN ABDUL RAZAK

Appellant/defendant

ROSNIE TIEDDE

Appellant/defendant

NURHADI A HAMID

Appellant/defendant

FUJI XEROX ASIA PACIFIC PTE LTD

Respondent/plaintiff

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal (summary Judgment) / Judgment on Appeal Remitted to Trial

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the preliminary conditions for summary judgment under Order 14 were fulfilled
  2. 2 Whether there exist triable issues requiring a full trial
  3. 3 Whether matters require evidence beyond affidavit averments to put facts into perspective

Ratio Decidendi

The High Court allowed the appeal and set aside the Sessions Court's summary judgment because the appellants raised at least one credible triable issue (document authenticity, payment patterns, price disparity and guarantor status) which cannot be resolved on affidavit evidence alone; matter remitted for full trial.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed

Orders

  • Set aside the decision of the Sessions Court granting summary judgment
  • Allow the appeal with costs