AMPROJEK CONSTRUCTION SDN BHD LOO KUO FONG
The Controller's extension was invalid because regulation 11(3) is ultra vires and cannot alter the mandatory Schedule H statutory contract; accordingly the SPA's 36-month completion term governs, LAD runs from the deposit date, there were no triable issues and summary judgment was properly entered; Ang Ming Lee applies retrospectively.
- Citation
- JA-12ANCvC-61-06/2021 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Parties
- Appellant/defendant: Amprojek Construction Sdn Bhd; Respondent/plaintiff: Loo Kuo Fong
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 24 January 2022
- Case Number
- JA-12ANCvC-61-06/2021 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal Against Summary Judgment / Appeal From Sessions Court (order 14 Application for Summary Judgment)
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed with costs
- Legal Topics
- Summary Judgment, Statutory Contract (schedule H), Extension of Time by Controller, Liquidated Ascertained Damages, Retrospective Effect of Precedent, Judicial Review Vs Contractual Remedy
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Amprojek Construction Sdn Bhd
Appellant/defendant
Loo Kuo Fong
Respondent/plaintiff
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal Against Summary Judgment / Appeal From Sessions Court (order 14 Application for Summary Judgment)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Controller's extension of time was valid or ultra vires
- 2 Whether there were triable issues precluding summary judgment
- 3 Proper basis for calculating LAD (date deposit/booking fee paid)
Ratio Decidendi
The Controller's extension was invalid because regulation 11(3) is ultra vires and cannot alter the mandatory Schedule H statutory contract; accordingly the SPA's 36-month completion term governs, LAD runs from the deposit date, there were no triable issues and summary judgment was properly entered; Ang Ming Lee applies retrospectively.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed with costs
Orders
- Appeal dismissed with costs
- Sessions Court summary judgment in favour of respondent upheld
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment