UNITED OVERSEAS BANK (MALAYSIA) BHD 1. ) MENTAKAB STAR MALL SDN BHD (Dalam Penerimaan) 2. ) PHENG YIN HUAH 3. ) PHENG CHIN KIAT 4. ) SISTEM DUTA SDN BHD 5. ) Chan Siew Mei
The court granted summary judgment to the plaintiff because the certificate of indebtedness was not properly or evidentially challenged and no bona fide triable defence was demonstrated; the defendants' counterclaims did not plead material facts sufficient to disclose a cause of action and were therefore struck out under Order 18 r.19 KKM 2012; the security for costs application was withdrawn and dismissed.
- Citation
- CB-22NCC-1-03/2022 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Parties
- Plaintiff (original); Defendant First (counterclaim): UNITED OVERSEAS BANK (MALAYSIA) BHD; Defendant (original); Plaintiff (counterclaim): MENTAKAB STAR(MALL) SDN BHD; Defendant (original); Plaintiff (counterclaim): PHENG YIN HUAH; Defendant (original); Plaintiff (counterclaim): PHENG CHIN KIAT; Defendant (original): SISTEM DUTA SDN BHD; Defendant Second (counterclaim) / Appointed Receiver: CHAN SIEW MEI
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 30 June 2022
- Case Number
- CB-22NCC-1-03/2022 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Banking/debt Recovery / Interlocutory: Applications for Summary Judgment, Strike Out of Counterclaims and Security for Costs
- Outcome
- Plaintiff's summary judgment application allowed; counterclaims struck out; security for costs application withdrawn/dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Summary Judgment, Strike Out/order 18 R.19, Certificate of Indebtedness, Receivership Vs Liquidation, Pleadings and Cause of Action, Service of Documents, Security for Costs
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
UNITED OVERSEAS BANK (MALAYSIA) BHD
Plaintiff (original); Defendant First (counterclaim)
MENTAKAB STAR(MALL) SDN BHD
Defendant (original); Plaintiff (counterclaim)
PHENG YIN HUAH
Defendant (original); Plaintiff (counterclaim)
PHENG CHIN KIAT
Defendant (original); Plaintiff (counterclaim)
SISTEM DUTA SDN BHD
Defendant (original)
CHAN SIEW MEI
Defendant Second (counterclaim) / Appointed Receiver
Procedural Posture
Civil Banking/debt Recovery / Interlocutory: Applications for Summary Judgment, Strike Out of Counterclaims and Security for Costs
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on debt claim based on certificate of indebtedness
- 2 Whether defendants' counterclaim(s) disclose a cause of action and should be struck out under Order 18 r.19 KKM 2012
- 3 Whether plaintiff's strike out application against counterclaims discloses merit
Ratio Decidendi
The court granted summary judgment to the plaintiff because the certificate of indebtedness was not properly or evidentially challenged and no bona fide triable defence was demonstrated; the defendants' counterclaims did not plead material facts sufficient to disclose a cause of action and were therefore struck out under Order 18 r.19 KKM 2012; the security for costs application was withdrawn and dismissed.
Court Disposition
Plaintiff's summary judgment application allowed; counterclaims struck out; security for costs application withdrawn/dismissed.
Orders
- Plaintiff's application for summary judgment (Kandungan 6) allowed.
- Application by Defendant Second in counterclaim to strike out plaintiffs' counterclaim (Kandungan 28) allowed; counterclaim struck out under Order 18 r.19 KKM 2012.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment