PENDAKWARAYA Puan Izalina binti Abdullah (Jabatan Peguam Negara) Puan Suzana Norlihan binti Alias (Tetuan Suzana Norlihan)
The court accepted the chemist's report establishing the substance as cannabis weighing 299.09g and found the chain of custody intact. The accused was observed holding the sling bag, attempted to dispose of it, and the accused's NRIC was found in the bag; these facts established actual possession and knowledge. Possession of more than 200g invoked the statutory presumption of trafficking under s37(da) DDA which the accused failed to rebut on balance of probabilities. Accordingly the accused was convicted under s39B(1) DDA.
- Citation
- WA-45A-32-06/2018 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Parties
- Prosecutor: Public Prosecutor; Accused: Muhammad Hafizul Rashid bin Emmy
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 3 September 2021
- Case Number
- WA-45A-32-06/2018 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal (drug Trafficking) / Judgment (conviction)
- Outcome
- Accused convicted under Section 39B(1) Dangerous Drugs Act 1952
- Legal Topics
- Trafficking, Possession, Chain of Custody, Statutory Presumption of Trafficking, Burden of Proof Under CPC, Conduct Evidence (s8 Evidence Act)
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Public Prosecutor
Prosecutor
Muhammad Hafizul Rashid bin Emmy
Accused
Procedural Posture
Criminal (drug Trafficking) / Judgment (conviction)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the seized substance was a dangerous drug within the DDA
- 2 Whether the accused had possession and knowledge of the drugs (actual or presumed)
- 3 Whether the statutory presumption of trafficking under s37(da) DDA arose
Ratio Decidendi
The court accepted the chemist's report establishing the substance as cannabis weighing 299.09g and found the chain of custody intact. The accused was observed holding the sling bag, attempted to dispose of it, and the accused's NRIC was found in the bag; these facts established actual possession and knowledge. Possession of more than 200g invoked the statutory presumption of trafficking under s37(da) DDA which the accused failed to rebut on balance of probabilities. Accordingly the accused was convicted under s39B(1) DDA.
Court Disposition
Accused convicted under Section 39B(1) Dangerous Drugs Act 1952
Orders
- Accused convicted under Section 39B(1) Dangerous Drugs Act 1952
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment