[Timbalan (TPR), Jabatan Peguam Negara] MOHD SOLEH BIN MOHD HUSSIN
Court found prosecution proved a prima facie case: accredited chemical analysis established identity and quantities; chain of custody remained intact; accused was alone and in immediate proximity to packaged cannabis and packaging tools and handed over additional cannabis from upstairs; quantity was consistent with trafficking; defence explanations were implausible and failed to raise reasonable doubt; therefore accused guilty on both counts and sentenced accordingly.
- Citation
- WA-45A-27-03/2021 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Parties
- Prosecution: Pendakwa Raya; Accused: Mohd Soleh bin Mohd Hussin
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 7 November 2024
- Case Number
- WA-45A-27-03/2021 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Trial Drug Offences / Trial Judgment and Sentencing (conviction and Sentencing)
- Outcome
- Accused convicted on both counts
- Legal Topics
- Trafficking, Possession, Mitragynine (psychotropic Substance), Chain of Custody, Expert Opinion, Prima Facie Test, Statutory Presumptions
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Pendakwa Raya
Prosecution
Mohd Soleh bin Mohd Hussin
Accused
Procedural Posture
Criminal Trial Drug Offences / Trial Judgment and Sentencing (conviction and Sentencing)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether prosecution established a prima facie case for trafficking under s.39B(1)(a) Dangerous Drugs Act 1952 and possession under s.30(3) Poisons Act 1952
- 2 Adequacy and reliability of chemical analysis and sampling by the Government chemist
- 3 Whether chain of custody was intact
Ratio Decidendi
Court found prosecution proved a prima facie case: accredited chemical analysis established identity and quantities; chain of custody remained intact; accused was alone and in immediate proximity to packaged cannabis and packaging tools and handed over additional cannabis from upstairs; quantity was consistent with trafficking; defence explanations were implausible and failed to raise reasonable doubt; therefore accused guilty on both counts and sentenced accordingly.
Court Disposition
Accused convicted on both counts
Orders
- Count 1 (s.39B(1)(a) Dangerous Drugs Act 1952, punishable under s.39B(2)): 30 years imprisonment from date of arrest and 12 strokes of the rotan
- Count 2 (s.30(3) Poisons Act 1952, punishable under s.30(5)): 3 years imprisonment from date of arrest
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment