S. SUMATHI A/P SELVADURAI SANMUGAM A/L RENGASAMY
Because the interlocutory default judgment establishing liability remained extant and was not set aside or stayed, the court must assess damages on the basis that the plaintiff's allegations are proved; accordingly the court awarded general damages RM5,000, loss-of-use RM5,150, aggravated damages RM3,000, costs on indemnity RM53,224 and interest on all assessed sums from 22.3.2022 until full settlement.
- Citation
- WA-A73-2-01/2022 (Mahkamah Majistret)
- Parties
- Appellant / Defendant: SANMUGAM A/L RENGASAMY; Respondent / Plaintiff: S. SUMATHI A/P SELVADURAI
- Court
- Magistrates' Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 3 August 2022
- Case Number
- WA-A73-2-01/2022 (Mahkamah Majistret)
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal From Magistrate Assessment of Damages / Assessment of Damages Following Interlocutory Default Judgment
- Outcome
- Assessment awarded in favour of respondent; interlocutory/default judgment remains in force and assessment proceeds despite pending appeal; awarded sums and interest ordered.
- Legal Topics
- Trespass, Negligence, Aggravated Damages, Indemnity Costs (solicitor Client), Interest on Judgment, Interlocutory/default Judgment
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
SANMUGAM A/L RENGASAMY
Appellant / Defendant
S. SUMATHI A/P SELVADURAI
Respondent / Plaintiff
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal From Magistrate Assessment of Damages / Assessment of Damages Following Interlocutory Default Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether assessment of damages should proceed despite pending appeal against interlocutory default judgment
- 2 Whether defendant can reopen liability or causation at assessment stage after default interlocutory judgment
- 3 Proper measure of damages for trespass and loss of use
Ratio Decidendi
Because the interlocutory default judgment establishing liability remained extant and was not set aside or stayed, the court must assess damages on the basis that the plaintiff's allegations are proved; accordingly the court awarded general damages RM5,000, loss-of-use RM5,150, aggravated damages RM3,000, costs on indemnity RM53,224 and interest on all assessed sums from 22.3.2022 until full settlement.
Court Disposition
Assessment awarded in favour of respondent; interlocutory/default judgment remains in force and assessment proceeds despite pending appeal; awarded sums and interest ordered.
Orders
- General damages RM5,000.00 awarded to respondent
- Damages for inability to use seized goods RM5,150.00 awarded to respondent
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment