LAM WEE SIN (L) (sebagai Pentadbir Bagi Harta Pusaka Lam Chen Khiong, Si Mati) 1. ) WAKIL DIRI / PENTADBIR / WARIS KEPADA PANG HIOK, SI MATI 2. ) PENTADBIR TANAH DAERAH KULAI
The 1966 power of attorney is void: it contains no express irrevocability or evidential recitation of consideration and therefore, under s.5 of the Powers of Attorney Act 1949, was revoked on the donor's death; additionally the purported sale contravened the Land (Group Settlement Areas) Act's prohibition on alienation outside the statutory assignment process, rendering the purported transfer invalid. Consequently the Plaintiff, as administrator of the donor's estate, is the beneficial owner of the land in expectation of title, but the court cannot compel the Registrar to issue title because alienation and issuance of title fall within the State Authority's discretion under the GSAA. The...
- Citation
- JA-24NCvC-433-05/2023 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Parties
- Plaintiff (administrator of Estate of Lam Chen Khiong): Lam Wee Sin; 1st Defendant: Wakil diri / Pentadbir / Waris kepada Pang Hiok (deceased); 2nd Defendant: Pendaftar Hakmilik, Pejabat Tanah Daerah Kulai
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 4 April 2024
- Case Number
- JA-24NCvC-433-05/2023 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Procedural Posture
- Originating Summons / Judgment (grounds of Judgment)
- Outcome
- Court allowed declarations that the 1966 power of attorney is null and void and that the Plaintiff is the beneficial owner; court declared representatives of Pang Hiok have no beneficial rights; court dismissed Plaintiff's claim to compel the Registrar to register title and dismissed damages claim; parties to bear...
- Legal Topics
- Validity of Power of Attorney, Beneficial Ownership Under GSAA, Alienation and Assignment Under GSAA, Revocation of Power of Attorney on Death, Remedies and Damages
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Lam Wee Sin
Plaintiff (administrator of Estate of Lam Chen Khiong)
Wakil diri / Pentadbir / Waris kepada Pang Hiok (deceased)
1st Defendant
Pendaftar Hakmilik, Pejabat Tanah Daerah Kulai
2nd Defendant
Procedural Posture
Originating Summons / Judgment (grounds of Judgment)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Power of Attorney dated 10.4.1966 is valid or void
- 2 Whether the Plaintiff is the beneficial owner of PTD 108227 (Lot 7216)
- 3 Whether the Registrar of Titles must register title in Plaintiff's name
Ratio Decidendi
The 1966 power of attorney is void: it contains no express irrevocability or evidential recitation of consideration and therefore, under s.5 of the Powers of Attorney Act 1949, was revoked on the donor's death; additionally the purported sale contravened the Land (Group Settlement Areas) Act's prohibition on alienation outside the statutory assignment process, rendering the purported transfer invalid. Consequently the Plaintiff, as administrator of the donor's estate, is the beneficial owner of the land in expectation of title, but the court cannot compel the Registrar to issue title because alienation and issuance of title fall within the State Authority's discretion under the GSAA. The...
Court Disposition
Court allowed declarations that the 1966 power of attorney is null and void and that the Plaintiff is the beneficial owner; court declared representatives of Pang Hiok have no beneficial rights; court dismissed Plaintiff's claim to compel the Registrar to register title and dismissed damages claim; parties to bear...
Orders
- Declare the Power of Attorney dated 10.4.1966 null and void
- Declare Plaintiff (administrator of Lam Chen Khiong) the beneficial owner of PTD 108227 (Lot 7216) in expectation of title pending state approval
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment