ANNIE MILDRED LOPEZ FRANCIS XAVIER LOPEZ
The court found on the balance of probabilities that the P.A. and the third will were validly executed with the deceased possessing testamentary capacity at the relevant times; the P.A. was revoked by the deceased's death rendering the P.A. challenge academic (thus Suit 333 dismissed) and the valid third will revoked the second will (Wills Act s.14); accordingly Suit 649 was allowed and the counterclaim dismissed.
- Citation
- BA-22NCvC-649-11/2017 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Parties
- Plaintiff (ba 22 NCVC 333 07/2018); Defendant (ba 22 NCVC 649 11/2017): Francis Xavier Lopez; Plaintiff (ba 22 NCVC 333 07/2018): Agnes Elfleda Lopez; Plaintiff (ba 22 NCVC 649 11/2017); Defendant (ba 22 NCVC 333 07/2018): Annie Mildred Lopez; Defendant (ba 22 NCVC 333 07/2018): Tetuan Lopez and Partners
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 1 June 2022
- Case Number
- BA-22NCvC-649-11/2017 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Procedural Posture
- Civil: Wills, Probate, Power of Attorney, Succession and Evidentiary Issues / Final Judgment at Trial Court (high Court Shah Alam)
- Outcome
- Suit BA-22NCVC-333-07/2018 dismissed with costs; Suit BA-22NCVC-649-11/2017 allowed; counterclaim dismissed with costs
- Legal Topics
- Validity of Will, Grant of Probate, Revocation of Power of Attorney Upon Death, Testamentary Capacity, Undue Influence/forgery Allegations, Adverse Inference Under Evidence Act
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Francis Xavier Lopez
Plaintiff (ba 22 NCVC 333 07/2018); Defendant (ba 22 NCVC 649 11/2017)
Agnes Elfleda Lopez
Plaintiff (ba 22 NCVC 333 07/2018)
Annie Mildred Lopez
Plaintiff (ba 22 NCVC 649 11/2017); Defendant (ba 22 NCVC 333 07/2018)
Tetuan Lopez and Partners
Defendant (ba 22 NCVC 333 07/2018)
Procedural Posture
Civil: Wills, Probate, Power of Attorney, Succession and Evidentiary Issues / Final Judgment at Trial Court (high Court Shah Alam)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Power of Attorney dated 10.3.2016 was genuine and valid
- 2 Whether the alleged third will dated 10.3.2016 was valid and executed with testamentary capacity
- 3 Whether the Grant of Probate based on the second will was valid or revoked by a later valid will
Ratio Decidendi
The court found on the balance of probabilities that the P.A. and the third will were validly executed with the deceased possessing testamentary capacity at the relevant times; the P.A. was revoked by the deceased's death rendering the P.A. challenge academic (thus Suit 333 dismissed) and the valid third will revoked the second will (Wills Act s.14); accordingly Suit 649 was allowed and the counterclaim dismissed.
Court Disposition
Suit BA-22NCVC-333-07/2018 dismissed with costs; Suit BA-22NCVC-649-11/2017 allowed; counterclaim dismissed with costs
Orders
- Dismissed Suit BA-22NCVC-333-07/2018 (challenge to P.A.) with costs
- Allowed Suit BA-22NCVC-649-11/2017 (challenge to probate) and declared the third will valid; dismissed defendant's counterclaim with costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment